Advanced Search Results
In the Goods of Mahammad Bashir (Deceased)
Kolkata
Apr-10-1961
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 263, 278(1), 283 and 283(1); ;Succession Rules - Rules 5 and 9
AIR1964Cal34
Santosh K. Basu and ;A.C. Ray, Advs.
ORDERP.C. Mallick, J.1. This is an application for revocation of a grant of Letters of Administration to the Estate of Mahammad Bashir deceased. Mahammad Bashir died in March 1960 leaving him surviving his sole widow Md....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Chandra Roy and anr. Vs. the State
Kolkata
Apr-27-1953
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 162, 252, 286, 297, 299, 342, 403, 410, 411, 411A, 411A(1), 411A(2), 418, 418(1), 423, 423(1), 423(2), 526, 537 and 556; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 114, 145, 165 and 167
AIR1954Cal305,57CWN962
N.R. Das Gupta, ;Nalin Ch. Banerjee, ;Santosh K. Basu, ;Sudhangshu B. Sen and ;Ajoy K. Basu, Advs.
Chakravartti, C.J.1. This appeal arises out of a proceeding which commenced in August, 1950 and which has, in the course of its progress from stage to stage, suffered certain vicissitudes.2. The proceeding had its origin in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCorporation of Calcutta Vs. Sri Iswar Lakshmi Janardan Thakur Jew
Kolkata
Jun-17-1953
Criminal
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1923 - Sections 488(2) and 534
AIR1954Cal47,57CWN907
Santosh K. Basu and ;Sunil K. Basu, Advs.
ORDERK.C. Chunder, J.1. This Rule was issued at the instance of the Corporation of Calcutta against an order of the Municipal Magistrate of Calcutta acquitting the accused opposite parties of an offence under Section 488 read...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bank of India Ltd. Vs. Chairman and Members of the Labour Appellate Tr ...
Kolkata
Jun-25-1954
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Section 7
AIR1955Cal344,58CWN844,(1955)IILLJ214Cal
Adv. General, ;S.M. Bose and ;Ajay K. Basu and ;Santosh K. Basu, Advs.
ORDERSinha, J.1. The facts in this case are shortly as follows : The petitioner is the Bank of India Ltd. (hereinafter called the Bank). Respondents 2-13 were employed by the Bank in its office at 23B,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›