Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: santosh hegde · Page 1 of about 520 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 02 1989

C.M. Iqbal Vs. Vijaya Alias Geetha

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-02-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 156(3)

Reported in : ILR1989KAR3432; 1990(1)KarLJ59

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv.

ORDERRamachandriah, J.1. This Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') is directed against the order dated 21-7-89 of the M.M.V. Court, Bangalore (for short 'the Magistrate')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1993

indumati M. Shah and ors. Vs. Narendra Muljibhai Asra and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-20-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19, Sections 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D, 7E, 8 8, 9, 10 and 12; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 - Sections 34; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 9, 34, 114, 120A, 120B, 161, 162, 163, 164, 166, 170, 467, 471, 474 and 477; Anti-Corruption Act; Delhi Police Establishment Act 1946; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 155(2), 156, 156(1), 156(3), 177 and 190; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976

Reported in : 1995CriLJ918

Advocate for Appellant : ; N. Santosh Hegde and Akshay Mehta, Advs. (in spl. Cri. Appln. No. 643/93), K.J. Shethna, Adv. (in Spl. Cri Appln. No. 644/93) and

ORDERN.J. Pandya, J. 1. These three applications are ' filed challenging the action of the learned Special Judge, Rajkot when he entertained a private com-plaint and passed an order under Section 156(3) of Cr. P. C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2001

Malay Ganguly Vs. Medical Council of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-10-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Reported in : 2003(10)SCALE361; (2002)10SCC93

B.N. Kirpal,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Ashok Bhan, JJ.Mr. Maninder Singh, counsel for Respondent 1 has drawn our attention to some of the salient provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956It may be desirable that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 30 1990

M/S. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd. and Another Etc. Etc. Vs. State ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-1990

Subject : Environment

Acts : Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1987; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) Act, 1981 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4, 5(2), 12 and 22; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) (Amendment) Act, 1987; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 245; Orissa Forest Act, 1972; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) (Amendment) Act, 1989; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) (Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1987; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Madras Forest Act, 1882; Orissa Forest Produce (Control of Trade) Rules, 1983 - Rule 3(7)

Reported in : AIR1991SC672; JT1990(4)SC267; 1990(2)SCALE907; 1991Supp(1)SCC81; [1990]Supp2SCR480; 1991(1)LC75(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Sharma and; Prem Malhotra, Advs

ORDERT.K. Thommen, J. 1. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgments of the Orissa High Court in O.J.C. No. 3235 of 1988 and O.J.C. No. 3100 of 1988. The High Court dismissed the appellants'...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2001

Sharma Coal Co. Vs. Commissioner, Sales Tax, U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-2001

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : (2002)10SCC652

S.P. Bharucha,; N. Santosh Hegde and; Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.CA No. 3997 of 1999We have heard learned counsel and are of the view that the matter must stand remanded to the U.P. Trade Tax Tribunal to determine...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2002

Smt. Mamta Pateria and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 41 and 42; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 40, 47(1), 47(4), 47(4A), 91, 94, 95(1) and 100; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 44(2), 50 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115; Madhya Pradesh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995 - Rule 5, 5(1), 5(9), 9; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Shiksha Karmi Recruitment and Condition of Service Rules, 1997 - Rules 2 and 5; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Members (Nomination of Representative) Rules, 1997 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT76; 2002(4)MPLJ196

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Shukla, Adv.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. These four writ petitions pertain to validity of selection of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III, made by Janpad Panchayat, Rajnagar in the year 1998.2. The case has chequered history. The Collector, Chhatarpur as per order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 1993

Girish Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-1993

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : ILR1994KAR439; 1994(1)KarLJ421

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Naik, Adv. ;Santosh Hegde, Senior Counsel for G.K. Bhat and Hegde Associates, ;P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Senior Counsel, ;A.M. Farooq, Adv. ;T.R. Subbanna, Senior Counsel for Kaleemulla Sheriff

ORDERM.Ramakrishna, J1. These Writ Petitions have been referred to the Full Bench by the Division Bench consisting of Shivashankar Bhat and Ramakrishna, JJ., by invoking the power under Section 10(v) of the Karnataka High Court Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1970

Bhujanga Hegde and anr. Vs. Sakarama Hegde and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-1970

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1971Kant208; AIR1971Mys208; (1971)1MysLJ81

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv.

ORDERB. Venataswami, J. 1. This petition under Section 115, Civil Procedure Code has been Preferred by defendants 3 and 4, in Original Suit No. 6 of 1966, on the file of the Civil Judge, at Udipi....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 1986

M.P. Abdul Khander Vs. Vijaya Bank and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-25-1986

Subject : Company

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 15; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 35; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3

Reported in : [1988]64CompCas199(Kar); ILR1987KAR970

Advocate for Appellant : N. Santosh Hegde, Adv.

P.A. Kulkarni, J.1. This is a revision by the judgment debtor (sub-tenant of the original tenant against whom the order of eviction was passed) against the order dated December 11, 1984, passed by the Principal Munsiff,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1995

V.M. Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-25-1995

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 408; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 630; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1996SC339; 1996(1)ALT(Cri)140; [1996]85CompCas465(SC); [1995(71)FLR747]; JT1995(6)SC433; 1995(5)SCALE191; (1995)5SCC767; [1995]Supp3SCR79

Advocate for Appellant : Santosh Hegde,; P.K. Dey,; Rani Jetmalani and;

1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises form the judgment and order dated April 28, 1995 by the Bombay High Court in Criminal Application No. 1222 of 1995. The appellant had joined the services...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial