Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sankar ghosh · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.051 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 31 1996

Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rangadhar Nayak and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-31-1996

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1997)11SCC496

S.C. Agrawal and; G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 17-9-1992 passed by the Orissa High Court in writ petition (OJC No. 4057 of 1990) filed by Rangadhar Nayak,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1967

In Re: K.K. Ray (Private) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oath and Fees) Act, 1948 - Section 3; ;Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 14 and 15; ;Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 3 and 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 139; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 82; ;Oaths Act, 1873 - Section 4; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 439; ;Company Rules, 1959 - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1967Cal636,71CWN430

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Deb, Adv. as Amicus Curiae;Sankar Ghosh, Adv.

ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an important point of procedure which requires to be settled by this Court. The point arises in this way.2. This is an application for winding up intended to be presented in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1967

In Re: K.K. Ray (Private) Ltd. (In the Matter of FranklIn Square Agenc ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-15-1967

Subject : Company

Acts : Notaries Act - Section 14

Reported in : [1967]37CompCas737(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Deb, Amicus Curiae;Sankar Ghosh, Adv.

1. This is an important point of procedure which requires to be settled by this court. The point arises in this way :2. This is an application for winding up intended to be presented in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 22 1968

Guest Keen Williams Ltd. Vs. the Additional Member, Board of Revenue

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-22-1968

Subject : Sales TaxLimitation

Reported in : [1968]22STC198(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh and ; G.S. Khettry, Advs.

Banerjee, J.1. A point of limitation has been raised in this Rule, by Mr. K. C. Mukherji, learned counsel for the respondent, as a plea in bar. We feel bound to deal with the plea as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1971

Gopal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-15-1971

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 9

Reported in : AIR1972Cal67

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh and ;Bhaskar Gupta, Advs.

ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application for removal of the named Arbitrator and appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of an arbitration agreement between the parties dated the 27 of Jan., 1967. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1967

Western Engineering Co. Vs. Paul Engineering Co.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-1967

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5) and 51A

Reported in : AIR1968Cal109

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh, Adv.

ORDERS.A. Masud, J.1. This is an application under Section 51-A of the Indian Patents and Designs Act (II), 1911, in which the petitioner has prayed for an order that the Design No. 127199 in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1980

United Commercial Bank Vs. Sanatan Bastushilpa Pratisthan Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-29-1980

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 16 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 8, Rule 11; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859 - Sections 5 and 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1877 - Sections 6 and 16; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 22(1) and 22(2)

Reported in : AIR1981Cal146

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh and ;Sudipta Roy, Advs.

ORDERC.K. Banerji, J.1. This is an application by the defendant Sanatan Bastushilpa Pratisthan for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of theLetters Patent, stay of the suit and all proceedings therein and for revocation of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1971

Murlidhar Haspuria Vs. Bansidhar Halwai

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-01-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1973Cal193

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh, Adv.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. The respondentfiled the suit out of which this appeal arises, claiming specific performance of a verbal agreement, possession of various articles of the business carried on under the name and style of 'Murlkihar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1979

Debi Jhora Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Barendra Krishna Bhowmick and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-22-1979

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas771(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh, Adv.

Ghose, J.1. This application has been made in the appeal that is now pending from an order made in an application under Sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1981

Indian Dairy Corporation Vs. Lasco

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-31-1981

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20

Reported in : AIR1982Cal96

Advocate for Appellant : Sankar Ghosh, ;Tapas Banerjee and ;S.P. Majumder, Advs.

ORDERSalil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, for filing the arbitration agreement dated 18th/23rd of Oct., 1979 and for order of reference of the dispute to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial