Advanced Search Results
Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rangadhar Nayak and ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-1996
ConstitutionService
Constitution Of India - Article 226
(1997)11SCC496
S.C. Agrawal and; G.T. Nanavati, JJ.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment dated 17-9-1992 passed by the Orissa High Court in writ petition (OJC No. 4057 of 1990) filed by Rangadhar Nayak,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: K.K. Ray (Private) Ltd.
Kolkata
Mar-15-1967
Civil
Diplomatic and Consular Officers (Oath and Fees) Act, 1948 - Section 3; ;Notaries Act, 1952 - Sections 14 and 15; ;Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rules 3 and 5; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 139; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 82; ;Oaths Act, 1873 - Section 4; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 439; ;Company Rules, 1959 - Rule 6
AIR1967Cal636,71CWN430
R.K. Deb, Adv. as Amicus Curiae;Sankar Ghosh, Adv.
ORDERP.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an important point of procedure which requires to be settled by this Court. The point arises in this way.2. This is an application for winding up intended to be presented in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: K.K. Ray (Private) Ltd. (In the Matter of FranklIn Square Agenc ...
Kolkata
Mar-15-1967
Company
Notaries Act - Section 14
[1967]37CompCas737(Cal)
R.K. Deb, Amicus Curiae;Sankar Ghosh, Adv.
1. This is an important point of procedure which requires to be settled by this court. The point arises in this way :2. This is an application for winding up intended to be presented in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Guest Keen Williams Ltd. Vs. the Additional Member, Board of Revenue
Kolkata
Apr-22-1968
Sales TaxLimitation
[1968]22STC198(Cal)
Sankar Ghosh and ; G.S. Khettry, Advs.
Banerjee, J.1. A point of limitation has been raised in this Rule, by Mr. K. C. Mukherji, learned counsel for the respondent, as a plea in bar. We feel bound to deal with the plea as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh
Kolkata
Jun-15-1971
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8 and 9
AIR1972Cal67
Sankar Ghosh and ;Bhaskar Gupta, Advs.
ORDERSalil K. Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application for removal of the named Arbitrator and appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of an arbitration agreement between the parties dated the 27 of Jan., 1967. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWestern Engineering Co. Vs. Paul Engineering Co.
Kolkata
Mar-10-1967
Intellectual Property Rights
Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5) and 51A
AIR1968Cal109
Sankar Ghosh, Adv.
ORDERS.A. Masud, J.1. This is an application under Section 51-A of the Indian Patents and Designs Act (II), 1911, in which the petitioner has prayed for an order that the Design No. 127199 in respect of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited Commercial Bank Vs. Sanatan Bastushilpa Pratisthan Pvt. Ltd.
Kolkata
Jul-29-1980
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 16 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 8, Rule 11; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859 - Sections 5 and 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1877 - Sections 6 and 16; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 22(1) and 22(2)
AIR1981Cal146
Sankar Ghosh and ;Sudipta Roy, Advs.
ORDERC.K. Banerji, J.1. This is an application by the defendant Sanatan Bastushilpa Pratisthan for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of theLetters Patent, stay of the suit and all proceedings therein and for revocation of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMurlidhar Haspuria Vs. Bansidhar Halwai
Kolkata
Dec-01-1971
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4 and 6
AIR1973Cal193
Sankar Ghosh, Adv.
B.C. Mitra, J.1. The respondentfiled the suit out of which this appeal arises, claiming specific performance of a verbal agreement, possession of various articles of the business carried on under the name and style of 'Murlkihar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Jhora Tea Co. Ltd. Vs. Barendra Krishna Bhowmick and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-22-1979
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406
[1980]50CompCas771(Cal)
Sankar Ghosh, Adv.
Ghose, J.1. This application has been made in the appeal that is now pending from an order made in an application under Sections 397, 398, 402, 403 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Dairy Corporation Vs. Lasco
Kolkata
Jul-31-1981
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20
AIR1982Cal96
Sankar Ghosh, ;Tapas Banerjee and ;S.P. Majumder, Advs.
ORDERSalil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J.1. This is an application under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, for filing the arbitration agreement dated 18th/23rd of Oct., 1979 and for order of reference of the dispute to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »