Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sanjeev sabharwal · Page 1 of about 813 results (0.209 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2009

The Commissioner of Income Tax-xiii Vs. Shri Ashish Rajpal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 143(2), 147, 148, 234A, 234B, 234C, 260A, 263 and 271(1)

Reported in : [2010]320ITR674(Delhi); [2009]180TAXMAN623(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv

Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The Revenue has preferred the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sunbeam Auto Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10(2), 26, 31, 143(3), 147, 148, 263 and 263(1)

Reported in : (2009)227CTR(Del)133

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv

A.K. Sikri, J. 1. This appeal was admitted on the following question of law:Whether Commissioner of Income Tax correctly assumed jurisdiction under Section 263 in revising the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2009

Director of Income Tax Vs. Sheraton International Inc.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 1, 4, 5, 9, 9(1), 142, 143(3), 147, 148, 163, 195(2), 209(1), 243B, 254 and 260A

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Del)752; [2009]313ITR267(Delhi); [2009]178TAXMAN84(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv

Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The captioned appeals have been preferred by the Revenue against a common judgment dated 04.10.2006 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') passed in ITA Nos. 50/Del/2006 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 10 2010

income Tax Vs Jagat Diagnositics Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-10-2010

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?No.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No.ORDER:1. The present appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2010

Commissioner of Income Tax . Vs. M/S. Devsons Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-2010

Subject : Direct Taxation

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. These appeals relate to the assessment year 1995-96 and was admitted to hearing on 20th March, 2006 when the following substantial questions of law were framed for consideration: - ITA No. 367/2004"1. Whether the Income-tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-14-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 143(3), 32

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. Regard being had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2011

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Radhey Shyam Bansal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 132, 158BC, 69, 158BD, 147; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41 Rule 27

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. In this batch of appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity the Act') preferred by the revenue. ITA No.582/2008, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Radhey Shyam Bansal has been treated as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Atam Prakash and Sons

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-08-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(14), 2(47), 45, 45(1), 54, 54B, 54D, 54E, 54EA, 54EB, 54F, 54G, 54H and 256(1); Land and Urban Ceiling Regulation Act, 1976; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Indian Easement Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 16(1) and 16(34)

Reported in : (2008)219CTR(Del)164

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv

Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as Tribunal') by an order dt. 13th April, 1988 passed under Section 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act') has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 2010

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Ifci Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-03-2010

Subject : Income-tax

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 271(1)(c)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? no3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? no ORDER1.In this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2011

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-iv Vs. Jaypee Dsc Ventures Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 260A.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Adv.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes1. The present appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial