Advanced Search Results

Jagdish Chander Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 22 and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Sections 482; Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21, 23 and 29; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1988 - Sections 3(1) and 10(1)

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)846; 2000CriLJ3162; 85(2000)DLT384; 2000(56)DRJ206b

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Sanjeev Kumar and; Sh. S.K. Santoshi, Advs

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. Crl. Writ 835/97 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 Cr.P.C. was filed by Jagdish Chander Sharma, inter alia, alleging that on 1st February, 1997 at about 2.30...

Container Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Shri Sanjeev Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B, 18, 33 and 33(2); Companies Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005(80)DRJ496

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Dhawan and; Shafali Dhawan, Advs

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The respondent workman, who appeared in person, prayed that the application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act for grant of wages during the pendency of the petition be heard at the...

Deb Ratan Biswas and Others. Vs. Most. Anand Moyi Devi and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C.) 1908 - Section 151 ; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 207 ;

1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and order dated 21.5.2004 passed by learned Single Judge of the Patna High Court in Civil revision No. 945 of 2002. 2. The facts have been...

Nirmala Kapoor Vs. Arun Kumar Sharma and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 55(1994)DLT385; 1994(30)DRJ350

Sat Pal, J. (1) This petition has been filed by Smt. Nirmala Kapur (hereinafter referred to as the landlady) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 9th May, 1994 passed by...

Deen Dayal Vs. Sanjeev Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyProperty

Reported in : AIR2009Raj122

Jitendra Ray Goyal, J.1. This is a defendant's first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure directed against the judgment and decree dated 7/7/1994 passed by Additional District Judge No. 1, Ajmer in...

Akkireddy Nihaarika Vs. Akkireddy Karteek Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : SANJEEV KUMAR __

TP(C) 1532/2020 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Transfer Petition (Civil) No 1532 of 2020 Smt Akkireddy Nihaarika Petitioner Versus Akkireddy Karteek Kumar Respondent ORDER1The transfer petition has been instituted for seeking...

G. Gangaram Vs. Apseb and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Wages Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board Employees (Revised) Conduct Regulations - Regulations 5, 6, 7, 10(1), 10(2) and 11

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD32; 2005(5)ALT524

Advocate for Appellant : Andapalli Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

ORDERRamesh Ranganathan, J.1. The petitioner, while working as the Assistant Divisional Engineer with the respondents at Ramachandrapuram, was transferred to Lower Sileru Project, East Godavari District, vide proceedings dated 28-11-1991. On his representation, expressing his inability...

Rajiv Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993CriLJ293; 1992(40)ECC446

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Kumar and; Ms. Aisha Karim, Advs

ORDER1. On 30th July, 1988 Rajiv Kumar s/o Shri Jatinder Singh was convicted under S. 20 Part II of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short the Act) by Addl. Sessions Judge, New Delhi....

Md. Rafique Ahmad Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1898 - Sections 420, 461, 468, 471 and 476; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 202, 203, 204, 204(4), 397, 397(1), 397(2), 398 and 482

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Kumar No. 1, U.P. Singh and Shyamal Prakash, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J.1. Whether an order taking cognizance and issuance of process is an interlocutory order and therefore not revisable under the revisional jurisdiction is a vexed question of law which on several occasions had...

Nasayam Mohammed Feroz, S/O Mohd. Farook and Two ors. Vs. Vijetha Agro ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 48, 51 and 291; Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 - Sections 20(1), 20(4), 21(1), 22 and 25

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas559(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

ORDERNooty Ramamohana Rao, J.1. This is an application taken out by 3 individuals Viz: Sri Nasayam Mohammed Feroz, S/o Mohd. Farook, Sri Pasapoina Nageswara Rao, S/o China Venkata Swamy and Sri Arimandla Veera Reddy, S/o Rami...