Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sanjeev agarwal · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.090 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 23 2018

Vijay Ahuja vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-2018

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal

$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h July, 2018 Pronounced on:23. d July, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3087/2015 and Crl. M.A. 11007/2015 VIJAY AHUJA Through: Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal, Adv. ...........

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 2016

M/S. Breweries Filters System Pvt Ltd vs.subhash Chand & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-2016

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal, Mr. Ekansh Agarwal

$~34 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. h November, 2016 W.P.(C) 3298/2014 & CM No.6817/2014, 17828/2015 & 9767/2016 M/S. BREWERIES FILTERS SYSTEM PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2004

Hem Chandra JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-19-2004

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1853

Advocate for Appellant : Daya Shanker Mishra and Chandra Kesh Mishra, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. These writ petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. The petitioner is challenging the Impugned order of the Commissioner of Customs Lucknow dated 11.11.2003, Annexure-6 to the writ petition.3. Heard learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 01 2019

Kashyapi Infrastructure Pvt Ltd vs.national Buildings Construction Cor ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-01-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal, Mr. Ekansh Agarwal

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2019. CS(COMM) 1280/2016 KASHYAPI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal & Mr. Ekansh Agarwal, Advocates. Versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2016

M/S Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs.vijay Mahajan

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-08-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~A-1 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI C.R.P. 55/2016 Date of decision:8. 11.2016 M/S OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.P.S.Narsimha, ASG with Mr.Sashi Prabhu, Adv. versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2021

Randheer Singh Vs. The State Of U.p.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-02-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : CHANDRA PRAKASH __

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.932 OF2021(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1190 of 2021) RANDHEER SINGH Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.933...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2002

Columbia Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-2002

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)LC50Tri(Delhi)

1. The present appeal has been filed by M/s. Columbia Electronics Ltd. being aggrieved with the Adjudication Order No. 22/99, dated 25-5-1999 under which the Commissioner has demanded Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 68,93,847.47 paise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2007

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Tirupati Processors

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

Decided on : Feb-09-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Being aggrieved by the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) the Revenue has preferred the present appeal. 1 have heard Shri K.J.Sanchej, learned JDR and have gone through the impugned order. Nobody appeared for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2005

Tata Sons Limited and anr. Vs. Fashion Id Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-2005

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1913; Indian Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2 and 2(2)

Reported in : 117(2005)DLT748; (2005)140PLR12; 2005(30)PTC182(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Praveen Anand and; Jyotsna Bal Krishna, Advs

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Plaintiffs pray:''(a) An order restraining the Defendant, its partners or proprietors as the case may be, their officers, servants, agents and representatives and all others acting for an on their behalf from using...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2014

Mohit Kumar Vs. Quality Printers Pvt. Ltd.and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-29-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.957/2014 29th October , 2014 % MOHIT KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Petitioner in person. VERSUS QUALITY PRINTERS PVT. LTD.& ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial