Advanced Search Results
Jeetsingh Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-07-2002
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 21, 42 and 55; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 156
2002(83)ECC365; 2002(3)MPHT131; 2002(2)MPLJ117
Sanjay Sharma, Adv.
N.K. Jain, J.1. Accused-appellant Jeetsingh is aggrieved by his conviction and sentence (10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1.00 lac), passed under Sections 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, (for short,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Kant Dwivedi Vs. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal (i) and a ...
Allahabad
Apr-23-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(3) and 6N; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(8); Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 2
2004(3)AWC2526; [2005(104)FLR6]; (2004)2UPLBEC1969
Sanjay Sharma and ;Suresh Singh, Advs.
R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Rama Kant Dwivedi seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJeenatbi W/O Mohd. Sabir Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jul-05-1996
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37, 37(2) and 50
1997(2)MPLJ21
A.H. Khan and ;Sanjay Sharma, Advs.
J.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri A.H. Khan, counsel for the applicant with Shri Sanjay Sharma, Advocate; Shri G. Desai, G. A. for prosecution.Considered case diary.2. It is the submission of Shri A. H. Khan, that prosecution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shyam Sundar Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-18-1999
NarcoticsCriminal
Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20B, 50 and 50(1)
2000(1)MPHT103
Sanjay Sharma, Adv.
R.S. Garg, J.1. The appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 23-3-99 passed in Special Case (Narcotics) No. 61/98 by the Special Judge, Narcotics, Jagdalpur convicting the appellant under Section 20B of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmir and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-25-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307 and 323; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(2)
2004CriLJ3686; 2005(1)MPHT411; 2004(3)MPLJ140
Jaisingh, Sr. Counsel, ;Vivek Singh, Adv. for No. 1 and ;Sanjay Sharma, Adv. for No. 2
S.L. Kochar, J.1. Being dissatisfied with the judgment dated 14-2-2003 rendered in Special Sessions Trial No. 29/2002 by the learned Special Sessions Judge, Ratlam, whereby he convicted appellants for the offence punishable under Section 3(2)(v) of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Kumar Sahi Vs. Iiird Addl. District Judge, Deoria and Others
Allahabad
Nov-23-2000
Election
Uttar Pradesh Zila Panchayats (Settlement of Disputes Relating to Membership) Rules, 1994 - Rules 3 and 7; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 79, 82, 98 and 117; Uttar Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Zila Panchayats (Election of Adhyaksha and Up Adhyaksh and Settlement of Election Disputes) Rules, 1994 - Rules 13, 17, 36 and 38; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Conduct of Election of Presidents and Election Petitions) Order, 1983 - Rules 4 and 63; Uttar Pradesh Nagar Palika Nirvachan Yachikaon Ki Niyamawali, 1959 - Rule 11; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148
2001(1)AWC181
Sanjay Sharma
ORDERYatindra Singh, J.1.This case deals with purpose, reason, and place of security deposit towards the cost of an election petition challenging an election in a local body. Are the rules relating to security deposit mandatory? Unlike...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabukhan and anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-24-2004
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149, 302 and 323
2004CriLJ3299; 2004(2)MPLJ53
H.S. Oberoi, Sr. Adv., ;Manoj Soni and ;Sanjay Sharma, Advs.
S.L. Kochar, J.1. All the aforesaid three appeals arise out of one and the same judgment, therefore, they are being decided and disposed of by this common judgment.2. The appellants Babukhan and Chhotekhan have filed Cri....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGopal Lal Vs. Tulsibai and Others
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-20-2001
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicels Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 149, 149(2) and 173; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92-A, 92-E, 95(1), 96(2) and 96(4)
II(2001)ACC360; 2002ACJ1278; 2001(3)MPHT234
Shri Sanjay Sharma, Adv.
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J. 1. The appellant, owner of the vehicle, has filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act (for short 'the Act') against the interim award dated 5-10-1998 passed by the M.A.C.T.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukesh @ Mubarik Sheikh Vs. Neelophar W/O Mukesh and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-23-1996
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125
1997(1)MPLJ677
A.H. Khan and ;Sanjay Sharma, Advs.;S.H. Sen, Dy. Govt. Adv.
ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. Heard Shri A. H. Khan, learned counsel with Shri Sanjay Sharma, counsel for applicant. Shri S. A. Mev, counsel for Opponent No. 1. Shri S. H. Sen, Dy. G. A. for State. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirdosh Model Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-19-2004
Civil
Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1941 - Sections 41A
2004(4)MPHT397
K.K. Trivedi, Adv.;Sanjay Sharma, Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The protagonists on the centre stage can not be oblivious of the fact that in the name of performance they can totally forget the script. In a drama of law better it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »