Advanced Search Results

B.D. Shetty and ors. Vs. M/S Ceat Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 10-A, 10-A(A), 10-A(1) and 10-A(3); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1959

Reported in : 2001IXAD(SC)53; AIR2001SC2953; [2002(93)FLR785]; 2001LabIC4000; (2001)IILLJ1552SC; 2001(7)SCALE513; (2002)1SCC193; 2002(1)LC401(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Parikh,; R.R. Chandrachud and; Ms Jayana Kothari,

Shivaraj V. Patil, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The question whether the 'delay' in completion of disciplinary proceedings directly attributable to the conduct of a workman under Section 10A(1)(b) of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 also...

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Skipper Construction and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 129, 136 and 142; Companies Act, 1956; Public Premises Evicion Act

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT331(SC); JT2005(4)SC455

Advocate for Appellant : L. Nageswara Rao (A.C.),;Joseph Vellapally (A.C.); M.N. Krishnamani,;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. There are some cases which at times strengthen the idea that existing laws may be inadequate to grant relief to persons whom, the court feels genuinely to be entitled to relief. Courts, more...

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Environment

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 47, 48A and 51A; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25B, and 25F; The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981; Environment Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : AIR1997SC734; (1996)8SCC462; [1996]Supp10SCR973

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Mehta,; Seema Midha,; Rajit Kumar,;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Taj Mahal - The Taj - is the 'King Emperor' amongst the World-Wonders. The Taj is the final achievement and acme of the Moghul Article It represents the most refined aesthetic values. It...

Textiles Labour Association Vs. Padmaben Manilal Parmar and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2F, 2J, 9 to 19 and 25F; ;Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 2 and 22; ;Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bombay Industrial Relation Act, 1946; Charitable and Religious Endowments Act; Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (Service Regulations) 1987; ;Nehru Yuva Kendra Sanghatan Rules; ;Constitution of India - Articles 31(2), 141, 226, 227, 310 and 311

Reported in : (2007)1GLR527

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Vasavada, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1

H.K. Rathod, J. 1. Heard the learned advocate Mr. D.S. Vasavada appearing on behalf of the petitioner - Textiles Labour Association and learned advocate Mr. A.K. Clerk appearing on behalf of the respondent - workman.2. The...

Suresh Jindal Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Limited and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 42(5), 50 and 55; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 3 to 11, 14, 14(1), 14(3), 14(6), 15, 15(1), 20, 20(1), 21, 26, 26(1), 26(2), 26(4), 26(6), 26(7), 28, 36(2), 37, 49A, 50, 51, 63 and 63(3); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 3 to 18, 19, 20, 21(2), 21(3), 22, 22A(2), 23 to 27, 37, 40 to 45, 46 to 54, 56 to 69, 72 and 75 to 83; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 15, 16, 26 and 61; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act; Companies Act, 1956; General Clauses Act; Electricity Supply Rules, 1956 - Rules 2, 3(1), 4(1), 5(1), 5(2), 5(5), 10(2), 57 and 57(1); Delhi Electricity Reform (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001 - Rule 2; Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (Performance Standards - Metering and Billing) Regulations, 2002

Reported in : AIR2008SC281; 2007(2)BLJR3086; JT2007(12)SC145; 2007(12)SCALE223; (2008)1SCC341; 2007(2)LC1243(SC); 2007AIRSCW6748;

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Parikh,; Lalit Kumar,; Anitha Shenoy,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant is a consumer of electrical energy. Respondent is a licensee. A meter for the purpose of recording consumption of electrical energy was installed at his premise. It was replaced by...

Indian Social Action Forum(insaf) Vs. the Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)(a); Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 - Sections 5(1), 5(4), 3; Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sanjay Parikh; Mr. Aagney Sail; Ms. Mamta Saxena; Mr.Pranav Raina, Advs.

1. The petitioner, Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), has preferred this writ petition for declaring Sections 5(1) & 5(4) of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (for brevity, „the Act) and Rules 3(i), 3(v) & 3(vi)...

Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesLabour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Societies Registration Act, 1860

Reported in : 2000IVAD(Delhi)709; [2000(86)FLR450]; (2001)ILLJ191Del

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This writ petition is filed by Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (NYKS, for short), registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. This peti- corporation is directed against Award dated 2.3.98 passed by Central Government...

Subal Paul Vs. Malina Paul and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 268, 276, 278, 283(1), 284, 295, 296 and 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 35A, 91, 92, 95, 96, 100, 100A, 104, 104(2), 117 and 588 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 1 - Order 49, Rule 3; Hindu Marriages Act - Sections 28; Government of India Act - Sections 108; Trade Marks Act - Sections 76; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 217(1) and 218D; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 54

Reported in : AIR2003SC1928; 2003(2)ALLMR(SC)703; 2003(1)CTC627; JT2003(5)SC193; 2003(2)SCALE373; (2003)10SCC361; [2003]1SCR1092

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Parikh,; Vandana Sudan and; A.K. Misra, Advs

ORDER1. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether a letters patent appeal would lie against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court filed under Section...

Sandeep Kohli Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)813; 61(1996)DLT720; 1996(36)DRJ471

Advocate for Appellant : R.D. Mehra,; Satish Tamta,; Sanjay Parikh and;

Vijender Jain, J. (1) By this petition (Crl.M.3245/95) under Section 482/483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'Cr.P.C.') read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners/applicants inter alias prayed for quashing...

Raj Kumar JaIn and anr. Vs. Kundan JaIn and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439(2)

Reported in : AIR2004SC3794; 2004CriLJ3342; I(2004)DMC823SC; 2004(5)SCALE318; (2004)10SCC612

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Parikh,; Anitha Shenoy,; A.N. Singh and;

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. This appeal arises out of an order made by the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby the High Court allowed the criminal miscellaneous...