Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sanjay kumar jain · Page 1 of about 145 results (0.097 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 28 2004

Anant Ram JaIn Vs. Vith Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-28-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1)

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3009

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Padia, ; K.M. Dayal, ; R.K. Jain, ;Atul Dayal, ; P. Padia and ; L.M. Singh, Advs.

Tarun Agarwal, J.1. The petitioner is the owner and landlord of a building situate at Kotana Road in the town of Baraut, district Meerut. The respondent No. 3 is the tenant of a shop situate on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2005

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sagar Mal Shambhoo Nath

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 4(A), 5, 5(2), 70, 143, 144, 159(3), 159(6), 170, 182, 183, 184, 184(7), 184(8), 187, 187(1), 187(2), 188, 189 and 256(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 3, 4, 23, 26, 30, 31 to 38, 39 to 55; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984; Predecessor Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23, 23(5), 25(1), 25(4), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 28 and 44; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(All)167; [2008]296ITR440(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhyay, Adv.

Dilip Gupta, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the '1961 Act') for opinion to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Somanath Mishra

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-29-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(II)OLR866

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mohanty

Indrajit Mahanty, J.1. In this writ application, the East Coast Railway has sought to challenge the order dated 26.6.2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No. 167 of 2006 by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2007

Binani Industries Ltd., Kerala Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercia ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-04-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 3A, 5, 5C, 12A, 13A(1), 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 22, 22A, 23, 24 and 25A; Customs Act, 1873; Karnataka Taxation laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 5C, 5(3), 5(91), 7 and 21; Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act, 1979; Karnataka Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1976; Karnataka Entertainments Tax Act, 1958; Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4; Finance Act, 1952; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34 and 35(10); Finance Act, 1956; Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, 1957 - Rule 6(4); Constitution of India - Article 366

Reported in : JT2007(5)SC311; 2007(5)SCALE429; 2007(1)LC0515(SC); (2007)6VST783(SC); 2007AIRSCW3071; JT2007(5)SC311; 2007-08(6)VATToday128; 2007(2)KCCRSN81; 2007(4)AIRKarR295

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman and; Harish Chander, Sr. Advs.,; Sanjay Kunur

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted in special leave petitions. 2. Challenge in these appeals is to the legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court holding that the Circular dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2005

Rama Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-02-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities etc.) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 47 and 47(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Rajasthan Employment of the Physically Handicapped Rules, 1976; Rajasthan Service Rules; Work Charge Employees' Standing Order; Constitution of India - Articles 46 and 311

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2911; 2005(4)WLC504

Advocate for Appellant : Tribhuvan Gupta, Adv.

R.P. Vyas, J.1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner - a visually handicapped person, praying therein that the impugned order dated 31.12.1997 (Annexure-P/6) may be quashed and set aside and the respondents may...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2007

Bhag Chand Vs. Himachal GramIn Bank

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-02-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(3)SLJ462(HP)

ORDERSanjay Karol, J.1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 15.10.2004, (Annexure PK), imposing the penalty of removal from service, which shall not be a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2013

Subramani Vs. State, Rep. by

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-11-2013

Subject : Criminal

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal(MD).No.78 of 2011 Subramani .. Appellant/Sole accused Vs. State, rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2013

Sanjay Kumar JaIn Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-06-2013

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Mr. Kuber Bodh, Ms. Jasbir Kaur

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6th August, 2013 % 1. CRL.A. 107/2000 SANJAY KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kuber Bodh, Advocate. versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2013

Present: Mr. Akshay JaIn Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-09-2013

Subject : Education

CRM-M-18064 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18064 of 2013 Date of Decision : 09.10.2013 Murti Devi and others .......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2019

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Ii),west Bengal. Vs. Vivekan ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Archana Pathak Dave

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 6221 OF2011THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER (II) WEST BENGAL VERSUS ...APPELLANT(S) VIVEKANANDA VIDYAMANDIR AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3965­3966 OF2013SURYA ROSHNI...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial