Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sanjay jain · Page 1 of about 906 results (0.171 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 2002

Delhi Development Authority Vs. the Archaeological Survey of India and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-02-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1) and 30(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959 - Rules 10(1) and 33(1)

Reported in : 2003(68)DRJ298

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Sharma and; Vinod Shukla, Advs

Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. Rule. With the consent of the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. This writ petition challenges the Order dated 14th November, 2002, passed by the Office of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1998

Navbharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. M/S. Continental Float Glass Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9(1)

Reported in : 1998(45)DRJ368

Advocate for Appellant : : Sh. Vikas Dhawan, Adv

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (for short the Act') has been filed, inter alia, on the allegations that Navbharat Ferro Alloys Limited, petitioner and its division Beardsell...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 2023

Shankar Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-15-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : SANJAY JAIN __ SACHIN PATIL

1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.954 of 2011 Shankar …Appellant (s) Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondents With Criminal Appeal No.955 of 2011 JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.1. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 03 2017

m/s.ansal Properties &Amp; Infrast.ltd. Vs. State of Haryana .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-03-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain

1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10017 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.20511 OF2008]. M/S.ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRAST.LTD. Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.Leave...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2008

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-2008

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 78; Representation of the People Act, 1951; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Parliament Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 311; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304 and 308; Evidence Act - Sections 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 215

Reported in : 2009CriLJ677; 151(2008)DLT695; 2008(105)DRJ557

Advocate for Appellant : Arvind Nigam, Adv. and Amicus Curia; Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.,;

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The question for our consideration is whether Mr. R.K. Anand and Mr. I.U. Khan, Senior Advocates and Mr. Sri Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate have committed criminal contempt of Court or not. We have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2019

Prabhash Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-2019

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain

NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.935 OF2011PRABHASH KUMAR SINGH ... APPELLANTS :VERSUS: THE STATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Aniruddha Bose, J.It is submitted by the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2007

Sunil Kumar Sharma Vs. State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13, 13(2) and 20; Evidence Act - Sections 5 and 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT407; I(2007)DMC654; 2007(95)DRJ347

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv

S.N. Aggarwal, J.1. The appellant, before he was entrapped in a corruption case on 2.11.1994, was working as an Inspector in Delhi Police and was posted as Chowki in-charge at Police Post Sarita Vihar, New Delhi....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2005

Anuj Johri Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2005

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 - Sections 18, 38 and 38(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(6) and 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites Remains Rules, 1959 - Rule 8

Reported in : 118(2005)DLT418; 2005(81)DRJ238

Advocate for Appellant : Tarique Siddiqui and; S.D. Kinra, Advs.,; Sanjay Jain,

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. By this common judgment, questions and issues raised in a batch of writ petitions numbering around 183 filed by Tourist Guides, are being decided. The above petition has been taken as a lead...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2010

Rakesh JaIn and ors. Vs. Vinod Kumar Bhola

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-21-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35, 36, 61; ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 37

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.,; Garima Jain and; Ruchi Jain, A

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 07.04.2005 passed by the learned Additional District Judge decreeing the suit of the plaintiff in the sum of Rs. 3,32,100/- with interest @...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2010

Jolen Inc. Vs. Shobanlal JaIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-28-2010

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 9, 11, 12, 12(1), 18, 18(1), 21(2) and 33; ;Trade Marks Rules; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : LC2010(2)176

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.,; Reetesh Singh,; Virendra Kumar

S. Muralidhar, J.1. These petitions challenge the separate orders dated 12th January 2005 passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) dismissing the Petitioner's appeals thereby upholding the orders dated 11th March 1999 and 11th October...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial