Advanced Search Results

Sebi Vs. Vatsa Corporation Ltd., Merchant

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. M/s Vatsa Corporation Ltd. is a Merchant Banker registered with SEBI. M/s Vatsa Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the merchant banker') was the Lead Manager to the public issue of Hitek Insustries (Bihar) Limited.2....

Sebi Vs. Shri Sanjay Chakroborty for

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Shri Sanjay Chakraborty is a Chartered Accountant by profession and was a Promoter Director of Healol Finance Pvt. Ltd and was also the Proprietor of Mahalaxmi investments.2. M/s. Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to...

G.M. Bosu and Co. Private Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Deepak Dhane, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1, Dr. Poornima Advani, with Ajay Khaire, Amrita Joshi, R2, Zal Andhyarujina, with Bhavini Menon Devang Kanakia, Advocates and R3, None

N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer 1. G.M. Bosu and Co. Private Limited, the appellant before us is a participant of the Central Depository Services (India) Limited, a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 and it is respondent...

Srikumar Chakraborty Vs. Datacon Systems Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 401, 473 and 482; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section s138 and 142; ;General Clauses Act - Section 27; ;Limitation Act - Section 5

Reported in : 2006(3)CHN222

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Chakraborty, Adv.

Sailendra Prasad Talukdar, J.1. The present case arises out of an application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2.Grievances of the petitioner may briefly be stated as follows:The petitioner is...

Maple Technologies Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Companies Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226 and 298

Reported in : 2007(3)CHN807

Advocate for Appellant : Amitava Mukherjee, ;Mun Mun Dubey and ;Sanjay Chakraborty, Advs.

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, J.1. This mandamus appeal is at the instance of a writ petitioner and is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge by which His Lordship refused to entertain the writ application...

S.R. Ramamani Vs. Deputy Director, Directorate Enforcement and ors.

Court : Kolkata Appellate

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Chakraborty, Adv

1. The petitioner in this art.226 petition dated June 15, 2010 is questioning the decision of the Directorate of Enforcement, Foreign Exchange Management Act, Government of India dated May 24, 2010 (at p.18) that the facts...

Sebi Vs. Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. M/s. Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Hitek) was incorporated as a Private Limited company on March 15, 1983 under the Companies Act, 1956 and was converted into a Public Limited Company on...

Sebi Vs. Shri Prem Prakash Verma, Promoter

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. M/s. Hitek Industries (Bihar) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Hitek) was incorporated as a Private Limited company on March 15, 1983 under the Companies Act, 1956 and was converted into a Public Limited Company on...

In Re: Director General of Police and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 9, 16, 19, 22, 34 and 114; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 151; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 141, 143, 340 and 341; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 22(2)

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1955

Advocate for Appellant : Balal Chandra Roy, Adv. General, ;Sovanlal Hazra, Govt. Pleader, ;Sandip Srimani, Addl. Govt. Pleader, ;Samiran Giri, ;Milan Bhattacharyya, Goutam Banerjee, ;Daisy Basu, ;Nisith Nandan Adhikari, ;Some

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Acg, C.J.1. These two suo motu rules alleging criminal contempt of Court were heard together as facts giving rise to issue of those two Rules are mostly interlinked.2. On January 15, 2007. this Bench...

In Re: the Court on Its Own Motion

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 9, 16, 19 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 141, 143 and 340; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 151; ;Constitution of India - Articles 20(3) and 22(2); ;Suo Motu Rules - Rule 29

Reported in : (2007)2CALLT370(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Balai Chandra Roy, leaned Advocate-General, ;Sovanlal Hazra, learned Government Pleader, ;Sandip Srimani, learned Additional Government Pleader and ;Samiran Giri, Adv. for Director-General of Police

Bhaskar Bhattacharya, A.C.J.1. These two Suo Motu Rules alleging Criminal Contempt of Court were heard together as facts giving rise to issue of those two Rules are mostly interlinked.2. On January 15, 2007, this Bench issued...