Advanced Search Results

In Reference Vs. Kailash Nahta

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Contempt of Court

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT48

ORDERR.S. Garg, J.1. Vide letter dated 21-5-2007 Shri M.P. Tiwari, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sagar made a reference to the District and Sessions Judge, Sagar for referring the matter to the High Court so that an...

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rafeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2001ACJ648; 2000(3)MPLJ561

Advocate for Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Amicus curiae and ;S.K. Seth, AAG;Virendra Verma and ;Sanjay Agrawal, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J. 1. Whether insurance company can challenge quantum of compensation under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is the question for determination in...

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Rfeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 96(1), 96(2), 96(3), 96(6), 110, 110(3), 110C, 110C(2A), 111A, 140, 147, 149, 149(1), 149(2), 165(1), 166, 166(2), 168, 168(1), 168(2), 168(3), 169, 170, 173, 173(1) and 173(2); Workmen's Compensation Act; Contempt of Courts Act; Madhya Pradesh Civil Courts Act - Sections 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 12 and 35; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 129, 129A and 129E; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 297; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 4, 25 and 115 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment

Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT288

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Verma and ;Sanjay Agrawal, Advs.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. Whether Insurance Company can challenge quantum of compensation under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure or under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is the question for determination in this...

Tabassum Bano (Smt.) Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(4)MPHT215

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Mr. Agrawal

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The expose of the factual matrix has its own unconventional singularity and does manifest special individual characteristics necessitating a keen scrutiny of the nuances of law relating to a writ at habeas corpus...

Brij Bhal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 198; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000MP265

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, ;Ravindra Shrivastava and ;Sanjay Agrawal, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In both these writ petitions challenge being to the award of licences in favour of respondent No. 10; one pertaining to tea, coffee, sweets, namkeen and fruit stall and the other for...

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Gulabchandra Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 - Regulations 4, 16 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT139; 2004(4)MPLJ91

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ; Sanjay Agrawal, Adv.

Shantanu Kemkar, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, the appellants/defendants have called in question the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1995 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Satna in...

Sunil JaIn Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sharad Verma, Shri. Amit Dubey, Shri. Lalit Pandey, Shri. Anoop Saxena, Shri. Narendra Nikahare, Shri. Neeraj Pathak, Shri. A. Mukhopadhyay, Shri. Sanjay Agrawal, Shri. Deepak Tiwari, Shri. S.P.Mishra

Cr.R.No.514/2013 29.04.2013 Shri Sharad Verma, counsel for the applicant. Shri Pushpraj Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard on question of admission. Petition seems to be arguable, hence admitted for final hearing. Learned counsel for the...

Deepak JaIn Vs. Narmada Club

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. N.S.Ruprah, Shri. Sanjay Agrawal

Writ Petition No.5887/06. 5.11.2012 Shri N.S.Ruprah and Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Lalit Joglekar, learned P.L.for the State-respondents no.1 to 5. None for the respondents no.6 to 8 although served. Petitioner’s counsel...

Santosh Kumar Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sanjay Agrawal

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Revision No.1412/2012 Santosh Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present : Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, counsel...

Prashant Agrawal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Banking

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sanjay Agrawal

Prashant Agrawal versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.12769 ”5. 9.2012 Shri Sanjay Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. D.K.Bohrey, learned Panel Lawyer for the State, on advance notice. Petitioner is working as Naib Tahsildar...