Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Mohd. Mohtram Farooqui

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Raj)434

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue P.K. Kasliwal, Sanjay Jhanwar and Sandeep Taneja, for the Assessee

By the CourtThis appeal is directed against the impugned order of the Tribunal dated 29-9-2000. The cash amounting to Rs. 5,92,340 was seized by Police Thana, Sikar, from the appellant on 8-4-1992. A Panchnama was drawn...

Jewels Emporium and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HHC and 80HHC(4B)

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(Raj)257; [2003]262ITR304(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : Paras Kuhad and; Sandeep Taneja, Advs.; R.B. Mathur,

Y.R. Meena, J.1. Since a common question of law is involved in all these petitions, the same are being disposed of by this common order.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has withdrawn the...

In Re: Modern Syntex (India) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 and 393; Rajasthan Relief Undertaking Act, 1961

Reported in : [2005]64SCL520(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Taneja, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Keshote, J.1. This is an application under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act, 1956') for directions to convene a meeting of the secured creditors of the Modern Syntex (India) Limited...

Mr Raj Deep JaIn Vs.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules,1959 - Rule 9; Companies Act,1985 - Section 16, 20(1) (2)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.K. Singhi; Mr. Sandeep Taneja, Adv

1. Instant company application has been filed by applicant Rajdeep Jain, Ex-Director/Promoter of M/s. Deeps Special Steels Ltd. u/R.9 of the Companies (Court) Rules,1959 seeking permission of this Court for recalling the order dt.30.01.2004 passed by...

Shakuntla Garg Vs. Shri Megh Raj

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicle Act, 1939 - Sections 9 and 110-A

Reported in : 2001ACJ354; 86(2000)DLT423; 2000(54)DRJ543; (2000)126PLR42

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Satinder Verma,; Mr. V.P. Chaudhary Sr. Adv. and; Ms. S

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. FAO. 352/80 is appeal by the claimants and FAO. 353/80 is appeal by the Insurance Company. The claimants filed the petition u/s 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 claiming a sum of...

Bullan and anr. Vs. Jasmer Kavr and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95

Reported in : II(1996)ACC633; 1997ACJ940; 70(1997)DLT552

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Goyal and; O.C. Khullar, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) By this order cross objections filed by the respondent (claimant before the Trial Court) are being disposed. (2) Shri Gurcharan Singh husband of respondent No. 1 Jasmer Kaur and father of respondents...

Bhullan and anr. Vs. Jasmer Kaur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1997)ACC311

Usha Mehra, J.1. By this order cross objections filed by the respondent (claimant before the Trial Court) are being disposed.2. Shri Gurcharan Singh husband of respondent No. 1 Jasmer Kaur and father of respondents 2 to...