Advanced Search Results
R.S. Avtar Singh and Co. Vs. India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd ...
Delhi
Feb-03-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)
AIR2003Delhi249; 2003(2)ARBLR503(Delhi); 104(2003)DLT227; 2003(71)DRJ500
Arvind Nigam and; S.K. Maniktala, Advs
Manmohan Sarin, J.1. This is a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act filed by the petitioner seeking an appointment of the Arbitrator on the ground of the failure of the respondent to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArunodaya Co-opeartive Group Housing Society Ltd. Vs. R.G. Desai and A ...
Delhi
Oct-19-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 28 and 30; Companies Act; Evidence Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2006(4)ARBLR306(Delhi); 2006(92)DRJ273
Shiv Khorana and; Sharat Kapoor, Advs
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Disputes and differences between the petitioner (herein after referred to as the owner) and the respondent (herein after referred to as the contractor) were referred to the arbitration of Sh. Swami Dial and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSewa Sons Builders Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Feb-06-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration Act
2002IIAD(Delhi)793; 2002(62)DRJ135
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. There is no gainsaying the fact that the Arbitrator is an instrument of the agreement and is not over it. If the Arbitrator traverses beyond the terms of the agreement such an...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Krishna Construction Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.
Delhi
May-13-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30, 33, 81 and 85(2); Indian Contract Act - Sections 73 and 74
2002(3)ARBLR508(Delhi); 99(2002)DLT593; 2002(64)DRJ252
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. Admittedly one of the Clauses of the agreement between the parties namely Clause 25 provided that subject to the provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1940 or any tatutory modification or re-enactment thereof...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaish Brothers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Delhi
May-06-2009
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 16, 16(1), 17, 30, 33 and 39; Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10
160(2009)DLT526
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 39 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act against order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGoyal Mg Gases Ltd. Vs. Premium International Finance Ltd. and ors.
Delhi
Jul-31-2006
Company
Companies Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 37, Rules 2, 2(3), 3, 3(1), 3(3), 3(7) and 4
II(2007)BC147; 138(2007)DLT259; 2009(93)DRJ831
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
Gita Mittal, J.1. This application has been filed under the provisions of Order 37 Rule 4 read with Rule 3(7) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendant No. 2, Shri Sumaj Jain thereby seeks setting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLucky Star Estates (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Delhi Development Authori ...
Delhi
Sep-03-2004
PropertyCivil
Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 48(1), 53B, 53B(1), 53B(2), 68(1), 97 and 206; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 97 - Schedule - Article 25; Contract Act - Sections 46
AIR2004Delhi428; 113(2004)DLT802; 2004(76)DRJ502
Sandeep Sharma, Adv; and Vice-Chairma
Anil Kumar, J.1. The controversy in this appeal is whether rejection of highest bid of the appellant after about one year four months and then again not returning the earnest money of the appellant for about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Vijay Prasad Vs. Directorate of Education and ors.
Delhi
Aug-05-2004
Service
Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 104
113(2004)DLT141; 2004(76)DRJ143
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Petitioner by this petition assails the order dated 27.10.2003 Annexure P-1 passed by respondent no.4 terminating the services of the petitioner w.e.f 28.10.2003. The services of the petitioner as Upper Division Clerk...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri M.C. Katosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Nov-22-2004
ArbitrationContract
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17, 30 and 33
2004(3)ARBLR518(Delhi); 115(2004)DLT466; 2005(79)DRJ365
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
R.C. Jain, J.1. Parties had entered into a Work Contract No. EE/SDD-II/84-84/6 for Excavation of Supplementary Drain from RD 11375 M to RD 11975 M above S.S.W.L. Disputes/differences arose between the parties in relation to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.S.J. Construction (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Sep-08-2006
Arbitration
2006(91)DRJ354
Sandeep Sharma, Adv
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. DDA's objections to the award dated 25.1.1992 published by Shri S. Nagarajan are being decided by the present order.2. DDA had to construct flats at Motia Khan, Delhi. The structures had to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »