Advanced Search Results
Jitendra Shantilal Shukla Vs. Bank of Baroda and anr.
Gujarat
Apr-25-2005
Service
Bank of Baroda (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995
(2005)IIILLJ305Guj
Sandeep N. Bhatt, Adv.
ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether resignation from service is akin to voluntary retirement is the only question which arises for determination in this appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the learned single Judge who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChhaganlal Kanjibhai and ors. Vs. Harsukhbhai Kanjibhai Harnesha
Gujarat
Aug-16-2002
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 18; Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 43; Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 2
AIR2003Guj60
Ashish M. Dagli, Adv.
Ravi R. Tripathi, J.1. The present First Appeal is filed by the heirs of the deceased Chhaganlal Kanjibhai, two of whom are his sons arid the third one is his minor daughter. The First Appeal is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSudhirbhai Nagindas Doshi Vs. State Bank of India
Gujarat
Sep-01-2008
Banking
AIR2009Guj38
D.P. Kinariwala, Adv.
ORDERRavi R. Tripathi, J.1. Rule. Mr. Sandeep N. Bhatt, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-Bank.2. The petitioner herein has filed this petition seeking the following relief:Be pleased to issue a writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhu Textiles Ahmedabad Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator
Gujarat
Apr-27-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act - Sections 3(1)O and 25(2)
I(2006)BC98
V.D. Nanavati and; V.K. Bhatt, Advs. for Petitioner No. 1
K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioner, namely, Madhu Textiles Ahmedabad Limited has filed this petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 praying for the compromise and arrangement as per the Scheme proposed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSun Chem. Vs. Geb
Gujarat
Apr-30-2004
Electricity
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2004Guj331
Sandeep N. Bhatt, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1
D.N. Patel, J.1. The petitioner prefers this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demand raised by the respondents for electricity consumption charges. The said electricity consumptions charges were to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of India Vs. Pankaj Dilipbhai Hemnani and ors.
Gujarat
Apr-12-2007
Banking
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(2), 13(4), 14, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 18 and 34
AIR2007Guj201; I(2008)BC355; (2007)2GLR1810
Sandeep N. Bhatt, Adv.
D.A. Mehta, J.1. In light of the view that the Court is inclined to take, the petition is taken up for final hearing. Rule. The learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties are directed to waive...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›