Advanced Search Results

Banarsi Devi and ors. Vs. Haryana Roadways and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : I(1996)ACC449; 1996(2)WLC564

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Mathur, Adv.

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the award dated 5.5.1988 given by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jaipur, (in short 'MACT') for the enhancement of the quantum of compensation.2. Briefly, the...

Prem Prakash Mathur Vs. Mohan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2007)ACC755

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Mathur

G.S. Sarraf, J.1. These two appeals have been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment/award dated 28.2.1995 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur.2. Briefly stated the facts are...

Kalli and ors. Vs. Indra Raj Baira and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 18

Reported in : 2006ACJ887; 2004WLC(Raj)UC789

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Mathur, Adv.

S.K. Keshote and Dinesh Maheshwari, JJ.1. This special appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949 is directed by claimants-appellants against the judgment dated 6.10.1998 of learned single Judge in S.B. Civil Misc....

Rashmi Verma (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Deewan Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3402

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sandeep Mathur, Shri. Sandeep

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Shri Sandeep Mathur, learned Counsel for the appellants has argued that the Tribunal has wrongly applied the multiplier of 15 whereas the age of the deceased was...

Shefali Devnath @ Anjali (Smt.) and anr. Vs. Ram Kumar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj801

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Mathur, Adv.

Narendra Kumar Jain, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. These five appeals, arise out of one accident and are directed against the common judgment/award dated 12.7.1993 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District...

Kamlesh Saroha and ors. Vs. Irshad Ali and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2007)ACC239

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Mathur

G.S. Sarraf, J.1. The claimant-appellants have filed this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment/award dated 14.2.1994 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District, Jaipur.2. Briefly stated the facts are...

Hans Raj Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj2994

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Sandeep Mathur

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Appellant being dis-satisfied with the quantum of compensation in case of 100% disability has filed this appeal questioning the correctness of quantum of compensation. The appellant met...

Girdhar Gopal and ors. Vs. Babulal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1999ACJ621

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Bhandari and; Sandeep Mathur, Advs.

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. Dissatisfied with the size of the award passed by the learned Judge, M.A.C.T., Jaipur dated 15.5.1989, the claimants have preferred this appeal.2. The claim-petition was related to an accident which occurred on...

M/S. Fabtech Project and Engineers Ltd Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM WEDNESDAY, THE6H DAY OF AUGUST201415TH SRAVANA, 1936 WP(C).No. 20015 of 2014 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER: --------------------- M/S. FABTECH PROJECT & ENGINEERS LTD., KONNATH,...

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Narayan Jat and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC570

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Manju Jain

ORDERR.S. Chauhan, J.1. Although both these appeals arise out of two different awards, both dated June 30, 2004, but the appeals are based on the same factual matrix and raise identical legal issues. Therefore, both the...