Advanced Search Results
Shree Ahinsa Prachar Samity and anr. Vs. the Appeal Committee and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-03-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 26, 29, 30 and 226;; Rules of Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 - Rule 33;; Societies Registration Act, 1860;; West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 22 and 22 (3);; Non Government Institutions (Aided and Unaided) Rules, 1969 - Regulations 6(2 and 3), 7, 7(1, 2 and 3), 8, 9, 9(1) and 33
(1999)1CALLT271(HC)
Dr. Samir Chakraborty, Adv.
ORDERM.H.S. Ansari. J. 1. The present writ application is filed by the Society administering the school in question. The petitioner No.1 is registered as a Society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the petitioner No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindo-solex Limited and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-18-1989
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 19(1)(9)
(1990)1CALLT355(HC),1990(25)ECC422,1990(47)ELT511(Cal)
Bhaskar Gupta and ;Samir Chakraborty, Advs.
Susanta Chatterji, J.1. The present Rule was issued on 22.5.81 at the instance of the petitioner Indo-Solex Limited, a Company and by a shareholder being petitioner No. 2 prayed inter alia for a Writ of Mandamus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Rayon and Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Kolkata
Mar-27-1992
Customs
Customs Act - Section 25(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 265
1992(40)ECC73,1992(60)ELT537(Cal)
Samir Chakraborty, Adv., ;i/b., Dube & Co.
ORDERAjoy Nath Ray, J.1. This is an application where the Writ Petitioner prays for relief against imposition of higher Customs Duty by reason of change in duty effected by successive Customs Notifications.2. On the 1st March,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.K. Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jan-28-2003
Service Tax
(2002)LC490Tri(Kol.)kata
1. These three bunches of appeals are being disposed of by a common Order inasmuch as the impugned Orders are against the same main appellant firm, M/s. J.K. Corporation Ltd. and its employees, and the issue...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMa Sherawali Impex and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jun-10-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(89)ECC573
1. All these ten appeals are directed against a common Order-in-Appeal No. Cal/Cus 15 to 24/2003 dated 11.2.2003 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) Kolkata by which he has set aside the orders in original...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Port) Vs. Goel Airshrienk (India) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jul-04-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)(122)ECC248
1. This batch of appeals involves the common question of law relating to maintainability for which all such appeals are heard analogous on such issue. Appeal No. EDM-394/03 was earlier heard on 20.3.07. Appeal No. CDM-61/03...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Mar-26-2003
Excise
(2003)(88)ECC751
1. By this appeal the appellants viz. Tata Iron & Steel Company (ISCO) challenge the Order-in-Original No. 58/Commissioner/2001 dated 29.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jamshedpur by which the Commissioner has confirmed a duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTisco Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-25-2006
Land Acquisition
(2006)(112)ECC15
1. Heard both sides at length on 24^th & 25^th April, 2006. We note that the matter was earlier remanded to the Tribunal by the Hon'ble Supreme Court by its order dated 16.2.2000 in the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.L. Knight
Kolkata
Dec-13-1979
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Schedule - Rule 8
[1980]123ITR734(Cal)
Suhas Sen and ;S. Banerjee, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, C.J. 1. In this reference under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, the respondent is not appearing. We requested Mr. R. N. Bajoria to appear as amicus curiae. We are grateful to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tripura Vs. Chanu Das @ Chan Mohan Das and ors.
Guwahati
Jan-17-2007
Criminal
A.H. Saikia, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 23.12.99 passed in S.T. sharp and penetrating weapons. On getting Case No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »