Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: samdani · Page 1 of about 180 results (0.090 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 07 2011

M/S Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Om Dattaji Rahiwasi Seva ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-07-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Act - Section 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1 Rule 8

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Pravin Samdani; Mr. Farid Karachiwala; Mr. Bhavik Manek; Ms. Pallavi Smriti, Advs.

1. These appeals are against two judgments and orders dated 5th April 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court declining to grant ad-interim relief in the notices of motion taken out by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 1990

La'Builde Corporation Vs. Hira Investment Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-13-1990

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 15, 20, 20(1) and 30

Reported in : 1990(3)BomCR777

Advocate for Appellant : Pravin Samdani, Adv., i/b., Pravin Mehta & Co.

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition to set aside an Award dated 13th September, 1988 made by the Arbitrators-Shri K.K. Desai former Chief Justice of our High Court, and one Shri D.A. Kothari....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1984

Shabbir Ahmad and anr. Vs. M.P.S.R.T.C., Bhopal and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1984

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 61; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304A

Reported in : I(1985)ACC232; AIR1984MP173

Advocate for Appellant : Samdani, Adv.

V.D. Gyani, J.1. This is an appeal preferred under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, by the appellants, who are parents of the deceased Salim Ahmed. It arises out of an award dt. 30-9-1981,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 20 2002

P.R. Shah Shares and Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. Vs. Bhh Securities (P.) L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-2002

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR789; 2002(6)BomCR776; 2002(4)MhLj195

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Samdani, ;S.K. Jain and ;Anil Agarwal, Advs.

S.A. Bobde, J.1. This petition is filed by the petitioners, viz., P.R. Shah Shares & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. against the award dated 12-10-1999 passed by the arbitrators of the Mumbai Stock Exchange under the Rules,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1988

United India Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Natvarlal and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-1988

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(2), 96, 98, 98(4) and 110A

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas558(MP); 1988MPLJ676

Advocate for Appellant : Sujan Jain, Adv.

G.G. Sohani, Actg. C.J.1. This Full Bench has been constituted on a reference made by a learned single judge of this court to decide the following questions of law ;'(1) Whether, in a claim case for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1988

United India Fire and General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Natvarlal and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-1988

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(1989)ACC9

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Jain

G.G. Sohani, Ag. C.J.1.This full Bench has been constituted on a reference made by a learned Single Judge of this Court to decide the following questions of law:(1) Whether, in a claim case for compensation exceeding...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2003

Volition Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Madhuri Jitendra Mashroo and Et ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 37; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : AIR2003Bom360; 2003(5)BomCR262

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Adv., i/b., ;S. Ashwinikumar & Co.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J. 1. The plaintiff, a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 has filed the present suit for specific performance of the agreement dated 24th July, 2002, alternatively and/or for damages...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 2011

Jer Rutton Kavasmanek and anr. Vs. Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-14-2011

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 43A; General Clauses Act - Section 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 28; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Depositories Act, 1996

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Pravin Samdani; Shriraj Dhru; Ms.Khyati Ghevarice, Advs.

1] This company Appeal is filed by the Appellants original Petitioners impugning the order passed by the Company Law Board, Mumbai (CLB) in Company Petition No.132 of 2009. By the order under challenge dated 14th May...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2011

Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit Vs. Smt.Pushpadevi G. Makharia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-29-2011

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6 Rule 17 - Sections 153, 16; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Pravin Samdani; Mr.Mayur Khandeparkar; Saps Rachure; T.N.Tripathi, Advs.

ORAL :1. Rule.Rule made returnable forthwith.By consent of parties taken up for hearing.The petitioner challenges the order dated 29.8.09 passed in RC Suit No. 187/99 vide which the applications filed by the present petitioner for amendment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1991

Mala Ramesh Pherwani of Bombay Vs. Ramesh Pherwani of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-26-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19(1)

Reported in : 1991(93)BLJR784; 1991(3)BomCR116; I(1993)DMC475; 1991(1)MhLj1188

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Samdani and ;N.M. Shah, Advs., i/b., Desai and Diwanji

V.P. Tipnis, J.1. This appeal, which was admitted on 21st June, 1991, was taken up for final hearing forthwith with the consent of the parties as the issue raised in the appeal was capable of being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial