Advanced Search Results
Dileshwar Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-23-2008
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 64, 70, 70.7.1, 70.7.2, 70.8, 71(2) and 72
Saktinath Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. and ;Achin Kumar Majumdar and ;Sounak Banerjee, Advs.
S.P. Talukdar, J.1. Both the applications under Article 226 of the Constitution relate to the same facts and involve identical points of law. Those are governed by this common judgment.2. Grievance of the writ petitioners, as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Banipada Saha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-11-1994
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226(2) and 309; ;Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 8; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 2; ;Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 93.3
(1995)1CALLT337(HC),99CWN455
Dipankar Gupta, Solicitor General;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Pradipta Roy, ;Saptansu Bose and ;A.K. Biswas, Advs.
Gitesh Ranjan Bhattacharjee, J.1. The petitioner is a member of the Indian Police Service (I.P.S., for short). He was appointed to the I.P.S. as a direct recruit in 1963 and was allotted to the Orissa Cadre....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManas Sarkar and ors. Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-08-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2000Cal251
Dipankar Ghosh as Amicus Curiae, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Ajit Kumar Panja, ;Prodosh Kumar Mallick, ;S.K. Kapoor, ;Nirmalendu Nath Mitra, ;Sibdas Banerjee, ;Adhip Chandra Kar, ;Pratap Chatterjee, ;Subra
ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. There are 5 writ petitions altogether. All the 5 writ petitions are meant for the purpose of granting relief in favour of the petitioners in the nature of regularisation of their candidature as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mono Ranjan Dasgupta Vs. Suchitra Ganguly and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-19-1988
Tenancy
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)(4) and 13(6); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 28; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 114; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 108(0)
AIR1989Cal14,92CWN929
Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Asoke Ganguly and ;Pradipta Roy, Advs.
A. M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. We dismiss this secpnd appeal as we find nothing to warrant our interference with the finding of the first Appellate Court that the suit for ejectment, giving rise to this appeal, is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Suprovat Ghosh and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-06-1983
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 31(1) and 55; ;Land Acquisition Rules - Rule 10
AIR1984Cal1
Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Kamalesh Bhattacharya, ;Sailendra Bhusan Bakshi and ;S.P. Roychaudhury, Advs.
ORDERManoj Kumar Mukherjee, J. 1. This application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by seven legal practitioners who ordinarily act, plead and practice in the Judges' Court at Alipore and also...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
May-11-2007
Service
Transfer of Property Act - Section 52; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 136 and 226
AIR2007Cal195,(2007)2CALLT522(HC),2007(3)CHN107
Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Chameli Majumdar and ;Santanu Das, Advs.
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. On behalf of the respondent company, a preliminary objection has been raised regarding maintainability of this appeal in view of cessation of the status of the respondent company. In the aforesaid circumstances,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinmark Finance and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Metropolitan ...
Kolkata
Jun-25-1991
CommercialConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177 and 179; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138
[1993]76CompCas155(Cal)
Saktinath Mukherjee, Adv.
Nirendra Krishna Mitra, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioners have challenged the complaint case No. 84G /B of 1989 arising out of a complaint lodged by respondent No. 2 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 28...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCompetent Authority Vs. Western India Commercial Co. Ltd.
Kolkata
Mar-12-1997
ConstitutionCivil
Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6(1) and 9
(1997)2CALLT294(HC)
Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Kalipada Mukherjee, Advs.
Basudeva Panigrahi, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed against the order dated 9.5.89 passed by the appellate authority under Section 33 of the Urban Land (Celling and Regulation)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Amar Kumar Barik and ors. Vs. National Instruments Limited and ors ...
Kolkata
Oct-30-2009
Service
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18(2), 19(3), 18(4) and 18(6A); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 619 and 620 ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 311
Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Swapan Kumar Dutta and ;Anindya Lahiri, Advs.;Indrajit Dasgupta, Adv.
S.P. Talukdar, J.1. The employees of certain Public Sector Enterprises filed several writ petitions with regard to pay revision of the Central Public Sector Employees following Central Dearness Allowance (hereinafter referred to as 'CDA') pattern in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTapati Mondal Ms. and ors. Vs. United Bank of India and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-19-2009
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 47; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
(2010)ILLJ59Cal
Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Kazi Safiuddin Ahmed, Advs.
Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the writ petitioner assailing the judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge whereby and whereunder the said learned Judge dismissed the writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »