Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: saktinath mukherjee · Page 1 of about 274 results (0.050 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 23 2008

Dileshwar Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-23-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 64, 70, 70.7.1, 70.7.2, 70.8, 71(2) and 72

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. and ;Achin Kumar Majumdar and ;Sounak Banerjee, Advs.

S.P. Talukdar, J.1. Both the applications under Article 226 of the Constitution relate to the same facts and involve identical points of law. Those are governed by this common judgment.2. Grievance of the writ petitioners, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1994

Dr. Banipada Saha Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-11-1994

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226(2) and 309; ;Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 8; ;Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 2; ;Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 93.3

Reported in : (1995)1CALLT337(HC),99CWN455

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Gupta, Solicitor General;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Pradipta Roy, ;Saptansu Bose and ;A.K. Biswas, Advs.

Gitesh Ranjan Bhattacharjee, J.1. The petitioner is a member of the Indian Police Service (I.P.S., for short). He was appointed to the I.P.S. as a direct recruit in 1963 and was allotted to the Orissa Cadre....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 2000

Manas Sarkar and ors. Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-08-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000Cal251

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghosh as Amicus Curiae, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Ajit Kumar Panja, ;Prodosh Kumar Mallick, ;S.K. Kapoor, ;Nirmalendu Nath Mitra, ;Sibdas Banerjee, ;Adhip Chandra Kar, ;Pratap Chatterjee, ;Subra

ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. There are 5 writ petitions altogether. All the 5 writ petitions are meant for the purpose of granting relief in favour of the petitioners in the nature of regularisation of their candidature as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 19 1988

Mono Ranjan Dasgupta Vs. Suchitra Ganguly and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-19-1988

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13(1)(4) and 13(6); ;Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 - Section 28; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35 and 114; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 108(0)

Reported in : AIR1989Cal14,92CWN929

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Asoke Ganguly and ;Pradipta Roy, Advs.

A. M. Bhattacharjee, J.1. We dismiss this secpnd appeal as we find nothing to warrant our interference with the finding of the first Appellate Court that the suit for ejectment, giving rise to this appeal, is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 1983

In Re: Suprovat Ghosh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-06-1983

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 31(1) and 55; ;Land Acquisition Rules - Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1984Cal1

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Kamalesh Bhattacharya, ;Sailendra Bhusan Bakshi and ;S.P. Roychaudhury, Advs.

ORDERManoj Kumar Mukherjee, J. 1. This application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by seven legal practitioners who ordinarily act, plead and practice in the Judges' Court at Alipore and also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2007

Ashok Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-11-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Section 52; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 136 and 226

Reported in : AIR2007Cal195,(2007)2CALLT522(HC),2007(3)CHN107

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Chameli Majumdar and ;Santanu Das, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. On behalf of the respondent company, a preliminary objection has been raised regarding maintainability of this appeal in view of cessation of the status of the respondent company. In the aforesaid circumstances,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 1991

inmark Finance and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Metropolitan ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-25-1991

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 177 and 179; ;Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138

Reported in : [1993]76CompCas155(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, Adv.

Nirendra Krishna Mitra, J.1. In this writ application, the petitioners have challenged the complaint case No. 84G /B of 1989 arising out of a complaint lodged by respondent No. 2 before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 28...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1997

Competent Authority Vs. Western India Commercial Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-12-1997

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6(1) and 9

Reported in : (1997)2CALLT294(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Kalipada Mukherjee, Advs.

Basudeva Panigrahi, J.1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed against the order dated 9.5.89 passed by the appellate authority under Section 33 of the Urban Land (Celling and Regulation)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2009

Sri Amar Kumar Barik and ors. Vs. National Instruments Limited and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-30-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 18(2), 19(3), 18(4) and 18(6A); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 619 and 620 ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 311

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Swapan Kumar Dutta and ;Anindya Lahiri, Advs.;Indrajit Dasgupta, Adv.

S.P. Talukdar, J.1. The employees of certain Public Sector Enterprises filed several writ petitions with regard to pay revision of the Central Public Sector Employees following Central Dearness Allowance (hereinafter referred to as 'CDA') pattern in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2009

Tapati Mondal Ms. and ors. Vs. United Bank of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 47; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2010)ILLJ59Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Saktinath Mukherjee and ;Kazi Safiuddin Ahmed, Advs.

Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of the writ petitioner assailing the judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge whereby and whereunder the said learned Judge dismissed the writ petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial