Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sakesh kumar · Page 1 of about 69 results (0.053 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 1996

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Swaropchandra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-24-1996

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 1996VIIIAD(SC)306; AIR1997SC301; 1996(7)SCALE616; (1996)11SCC175; [1996]Supp6SCR684

Advocate for Appellant : Sakesh Kumar and; S.K. Agnihortr, Advs

1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court made on 31st March, 1983 in Misc. Petition No. 203 of 1983.2. The admitted facts are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2009

Orissa Power Transmission Corporation Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Power Tra ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Apr-30-2009

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant/(s): Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent (s): Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Mr. D. Khandelwal (E.D0, Mr. Deepak Shrivastava, DGM and Mr. Dilly Singh, DGM, MP PTC.

Now it is reported by Mr.V.K. Mehta, learned counsel for the appellant that he has filed his written submissions on 24.4.2009. Mr. Sakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent submits that his written submission is under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2011

Rajpal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-04-2011

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 33C(2); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 21; Delhi Transport Corporation Act

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Adv.

1. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 3 rd February 1999 issued by Delhi Transport Corporation („DTC), the Respondent herein, fixing the pay of the Petitioner in the scale of peon. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 15 2011

In the Matter Of: Gujarat Electricity Transmission Company Ltd Sardar ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jul-15-2011

Subject : Electricity

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for Appellant: Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Advocate. Counsel for Respondents: R2, R3, Mr Sakesh Kumar, R6, Mr Umapathi, Advocate.

V.J. Talwar, Technical Member, J. 1 The Appellant, Gujarat Electricity Transmission Company Limited (GETCO) is a transmission licensee and State Transmission Utility (STU) in the state of Gujarat. 2 Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Central Commission) is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2005

Savita Sapru and anr. Vs. Amarjeet Singh Juneja

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(2), 5, 7, 8, 8(1) and 8(2); Arbitration Act - Sections 34 and 42; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115 - Order 8, Rule 11

Reported in : 2005(2)ARBLR338(Delhi); 121(2005)DLT294

Advocate for Appellant : Sakesh Kumar, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure challenges the Order dated 23rd July, 2001 passed by the Additional District Judge, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the `ADJ and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2007

M.P. Power Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Apr-27-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL49

2. The present appeal is directed against the Order dated 27^th September, 2006, in Petition No. 94 of 2002 passed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Respondent No. 1 herein, by which the Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2015

Sudhir Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Harish Malhotra, Mr. Sakesh Kumar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.456/2015 16th January , 2015 SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2014

State Vs. Mohd. Yasin

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2014

Subject : Narcotics

$~R-38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on:03. 03.2014 Judgment Delivered on :07.03.2014 CRL.A. 135/2006 STATE Through ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. versus MOHD. YASIN Through ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2009

Kusum Devi Vs. Mohan Lal (Dead) by L.Rs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2009

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1), 17, 18, 21(1) and 25 to 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 7; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1); Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1986 - Sections 21(1); Landlord and Tenant Act, 1954

Reported in : JT2009(7)SC107; 2009(5)SCALE343; (2009)11SCC594; 2009(4)LC1950(SC):2009AIRSCW3955:2009(3)LHSC1827

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Agarwal, Sr. Adv.,; Akshat Srivastava,; P.P. Singh a

B.N. Agrawal, J.1. The appellant - landlady filed a suit for eviction of respondent-tenant from the suit premises under Section 12(1)(a),(c),(e), (g) and (o) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2008

Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. National Panasonic India Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141; General Clauses Act - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 177, 178 and 179; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2009SC1168; 2009CriLJ1109; 156(2009)DLT160(SC); (2009)2GLR1467; JT2008(13)SC671; 2009(2)KLT113(SC); (2009)153PLR525; RLW2009(1)SC645; 2008(16)SCALE317; (2009)1SCC720:2009(1)LHSC107:2009AIRSCW410

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Territorial jurisdiction of a court to try an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, 'the Act') is in question in this appeal.The said question arose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial