Advanced Search Results

Chinnamma Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1447; I(2004)DMC517SC; JT2004(3)SC54; 2004(2)SCALE640; (2004)12SCC244

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Saharya, Adv. (A.C.

N. Santosh Hegde, J.1. Appellant herein was convicted by the Court of Session, Pathanamthitta, Kerala for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for having committed the murder...

Woodcrafts Enterprises Corporation Private Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1972]29STC315(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Saharya and; Bhagwati Pershad, Advs.

P.N. Khanna, J. 1. This writ petition under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by M/s. Woodcraft Enterprises Corporation Private Limited of Kirti Nagar, New Delhi, praying for the issuance...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Shivendra Bikaram Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325, 452 and 497; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2), 97, 101, 102, 162 and 163; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Army Act - Sections 130; Military Laws

Reported in : AIR2003SC2481; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)147; 2003CriLJ3028; JT2003(4)SC235; 2003(4)SCALE284; (2003)6SCC359; [2003]3SCR881; 2003(2)LC1066(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Anup G. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv.,; R.C. Verma,; R.N. Poddar an

B.P. Singh, J. 1. In this appeal by special leave the Union of India has impugned the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay at Goa dated May 2, 2001 in criminal writ petition...

Lieut Swaran Singh Bhindra Vs. Surinder Kaur

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 16(1979)DLT32

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Saharia and; P.K. Jain, Advs

S.S. Chadha, J.(1) This revision petition under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 18th February, 1978 passed by Shri S.N. Kapur, Sub-Judge 1st Class Delhi allowing an application...

S. Amarjit Singh Kalra (Dead) by Lrs. and ors. and Smt. Ram Piari (Dea ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 11, 11(1), 17, 18, 30, 31 and 31(2); Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13) and 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 141 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 22, Rules 3, 4, 9 and 9(1) - Order 23, Rule 1(4) - Order 41, Rule 33; Delhi Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 4; Defence of India Act, 1939; Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913 - Sections 15; Hindu Law; Tenancy Act - Sections 5(2); Constitution of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC2588; 2003(2)ALD1(SC); RLW2003(2)SC222; (2003)3SCC272; [2002]SUPP5SCR350

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Siddhu,; K. Parasaran,; K. Rama Moorthy,;

D. Raju, J.1. Special leave granted in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 11914-11915 of 1991.2. On 14.8.2002, this Court allowed the applications filed in C.A. Nos. 1029-1030 of 1992 and Civil Appeals arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos....

Delhi Development Authority Vs. Bhim Sain Goel And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : SAHARYA & CO. __

‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3151 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) No.17367 of 2016) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant (s) VERSUS BHIM SAIN GOEL AND ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K. M....

Mahdoom Bava Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : VIRESH B. SAHARYA __

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO……………OF2023(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.376 OF2023 MAHDOOM BAVA … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION … RESPONDENT(S) With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO……………….OF2023(Arising out of...

Mahadev Prasad Pant Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 24, 25, 26, 27 and 114; Prisoners Act, 1920 - Sections 4 and 5; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 299, 302, 392, 396, 397, 411 and 460; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 162, 164 and 313

Reported in : 2007(96)DRJ167

Advocate for Appellant : Viresh B. Saharya, amices Curiae in Criminal Appeal No. 337/2002 and; Shiv Prakash Pandey, Adv. in Crim

Aruna Suresh, J.1. By this common judgment we shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 337/2002, Mahadev Prasad Pant v. State of Delhi and Criminal Appeal No. 338/2002, Sudershan Dutta v. State of Delhi arising out of...

Indian Agencies (Regd.), Bangalore Vs. Additional Commissioner of Comm ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2), 8(4), 8(5), 8(6), 8(7), 8(8), 8A(1), 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4) and 13(5); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 62; Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 - Rules 12, 12(1) and 12(2); Central Sales Tax (Karnataka) Rules, 1958 - Rule 6; Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) (Amendment) Rules, 1974; Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) (Amendment) Rules, 1976; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : JT2005(1)SC16; 2005(1)KLT327(SC); (2005)2SCC129; [2005]139STC329(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Saharya, Sr. Adv.,; Atul Sharma,; Anoop Rawat and;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. In the above appeal, the appellant has impugned the judgment dated 12.11.1998 passed by the High Court of Karnataka whereby the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes dated 22.05.1998 was upheld....

Balwant Narayan Bhagde Vs. M.D. Bhagwat and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 95 and 96

Reported in : AIR1975SC1767; (1976)1SCC700; [1975]SuppSCR250

Advocate for Appellant : Sardar Bahadur Saharya and; Vishnu Bahadur Saharya, Advs

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. We agree with the conclusion reached by our brother Untwalia, J., as also with the reasoning on which the conclusion is based. But we are writing a separate judgment as we feel that...