Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sagar mal mehta · Page 1 of about 31 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 06 2001

Om Prakash Joshi, Advocate and ors Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-06-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(1), 24(4), 24(8), 35 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(3), 14, 16, 16(1), 124(2), 126, 162, 163, 165, 165(2), 165(3), 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 222, 222(1), 226, 319, 361(1), 367 and 368 ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(7) - Order 3, Rule 4(2) and Rule 4(6); General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Advocates Act, 1961 ;

Reported in : AIR2002Raj33; 2001(3)WLC199; 2001(3)WLN632

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Bhandari, Adv.

Lakshmanan, C.J. (1). The petitioners in the instant writ petition are the practicing advocates at Jodhpur. They filed the writ petition with the followingprayers:-'It is, therefore, prayed that a writ, direction or order or in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1999

Teju Mal Vs. Daya Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-04-1999

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 114 and 118; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : [1999]98CompCas229(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Adv.

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. The plaintiff-appellant herein seeks to challenge the decree dated May 29, 1981, of the learned District Judge, Tonk, whereby his money suit based on a pronote was dismissed. The parties hereinafter shall...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1971

Jamal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-20-1971

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Rajasthan Land Revenue (Saline Areas Allotment), Rules, 1962

Reported in : AIR1972Raj209; 1971(4)WLN660

Advocate for Appellant : Sagar Mal Mehta, Adv. (in W.P. Nos. 218 of 1969 and 1683 of 1970),; Guman Mal Lodha and;

ORDERV.P. Tyagi, J.1. Since common questions of law are involved in all these three writ petitions filed by the manufacturers of salt at Didwana and Pachpadra Salt Sources, I propose to dispose them of by one...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 2002

Bhawani Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff) Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 9, 11 and 19; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 39, 41, 42 and 254(2)

Reported in : RLW2003(3)Raj1755; 2002(5)WLN269

Advocate for Appellant : Sagar Mal Mehta, Adv. General, assisted by; Sandeep Bhandawat, Adv.;

Balia, J.1. The common issue raised in all these cases is the constitutional validity of the Rajasthan Regulation of Appointments to Public Services Rationalisation of Staff Act, 1999 (hereinafter called Act of 1999). Various provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2007

Rajasthan Tennis Association Through Its President Vs. Rajasthan Coope ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-05-2007

Subject : Education

Reported in : 2008(3)WLN116

R.M. Lodha, J.1. In view of the controversy that has been advanced before us, we intend to dispose of the appeal finally at this stage.2. Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, the Counsel for the appellant made the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2000

Shiv Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Third Amendment) Ordinance, 1999 - Sections 19; Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 169, 173, 207, 208, 227, 228, 239, 240, 245, 397 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 243-F and 329

Reported in : 2000(3)WLN563

Advocate for Appellant : Mahesh Bora,; P.P. Chaudhary,; Rajesh Joshi,;

ORDERMathur, J.(1). By this group of writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Sec. 19 (g), 19 (gg) and Proviso (ii) of Section 19 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2007

Hari Mohan Sharma Vs. Smt. Santosh Pareek

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-19-2007

Subject : Family

Reported in : 2007(1)WLN161

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. 'You know betterYour relations with the other.But would it be a crimeTo spare some time.And ask about meabout how I am?'And where I am?'These words appear to have been uttered in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2004

Chandra Mohan Sharma (Dr.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-20-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Medical Service (Collegiate Branch) Rules, 1962 - Rules 5, 6, 7, 12, 23, 24, 24A, 25, 30 and 30(1)

Reported in : RLW2004(3)Raj1621; 2004(2)WLC9

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Rastogi, Adv.

Ashok Parihar, J.1. The petitioner, on recommendations of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC), was appointed on the post of Lecturer in the speciality of Neurology vide order dated 7.1.1991. On recommendations of the Departmental Promotion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2000

Shiv Ram Etc. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-28-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 213; Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR2000Raj416; 2000(4)WLC412

Advocate for Appellant : Mahesh Bora,; P.P. Chaudhary,; Rajesh Joshi,;

ORDER1. By this group of writ petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the constitutional validity of Section 19(g), 19(gg) and Proviso (ii) of Section 19 of the Rajasthan Panchayati...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1987

Sampat Mal Lodha Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-27-1987

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 14A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405

Reported in : [1990]68CompCas612(Raj); 1987(2)WLN1

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Mehta and; A.K. Rajvanshy, Advs.

N.C. Sharma, J.1. By this order, I shall be deciding Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 87 of 1986 and also Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 81 of 1986, both filed by Sampat Mal Lodha, under Section 482, Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial