Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s venkataraman · Page 1 of about 454 results (0.155 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 20 1999

M. Babu Vs. the Joint Zonal Manager -cum- Disciplinary Authority South ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-20-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : C.C.A. Rules -- Rule 15(5)

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC285; (1999)IILLJ1045Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDER1. In this writ petition, the petitioner an employee of the respondent bank prays for the issue of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the Order No. ZO:IR:AS:114 dated 17.5.1999 and quash...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1998

K. Govindaswamy Vs. Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Rep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ323

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Venkataraman, Mr. Venkataraman

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. The petitioner has approached this Court to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 23.6.1988 in RC.A9/05370/ 88 as confirmed by he second respondent in his Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 1988

A. Malaichamy Vs. Director of Health Services and Family Planning, Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-1988

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Revenue Recovery Act

Reported in : (1990)ILLJ470Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Venkataraman

ORDER1. This writ petition is filed to call for the records relating to the disciplinary proceedings in No. 90908/ESI/SC/72 dated 1st December 1975 and quash the same. 2. In the affidavit sworn to by the petitioner,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 06 1994

S. Sankaran Vs. Inspector, Triplicane Range, Traffic Investigation Dep ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-06-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A, 337 and 338; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 203, 249, 258, 300(5), 437 and 482

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2823

Advocate for Appellant : S. Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition is filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 690 of 1991 on the file of VI Metropolitan Magistrate, Madras. The petitioner is accused in that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2011

C.Logeswaran Vs. the Special Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-2011

Subject : Co-operative Societies

Acts : Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988 - Rule 149(3); Constitution of India - Article 226; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act - Section 10; Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act - Section 81; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDER1. The writ petition is directed against the charge memo of the respondent dated 25.6.2004, on the basis that the respondent has no power to continue the disciplinary proceedings since the petitioner was relieved from service...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1988

British Physical Laboratories India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Government of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1988

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(37)ELT344(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N. Ganapathy, Adv. for ;S. Venkataraman and Jyoti-Balasundaram, Advs.

Swamikkannu, J.1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying that In the circumstances stated therein, and in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1989

N. Janakiraman Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Loca ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-13-1989

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1990)1MLJ216

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Venkataraman

ORDERBakthavatsalam J.1. The petitioner challenges the order of the Government passed in G.O.Rt. No. 1191, Rural Development and Local Administration Department dated 10.8.1983 passing an order of reduction permanently in rank from the post of Bill...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 1999

East India Ceramics and ors. Vs. Labour Officer (Conciliation) and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-15-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1), 12 and 19(2)

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ1392Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S. Venkataraman, Sri. Venkataraman

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. In W.P. No. 18602 of 1998, the petitioner East India Ceramics, prays for the issue of writ of prohibition prohibiting the first respondent from proceeding further with the conciliation proceedings in regard to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2001

Muruganandam P. Vs. State Industries Promotion Corporation and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Reported in : (2001)IILLJ1657Mad

Advocate for Appellant : S. Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner prays for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings No. E3/MISC/76/92 dated May 31, 1993 of the first respondent, as confirmed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2007

A. Asokan Vs. the Ii 558 Kudhiraichandal Primary Agricultural Co-op. B ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-2007

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Tamil Nadu payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1981; Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 75; Tamilnadu Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Common Cadre Regulations, 2000 - Regulation 29; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2007)3MLJ164

Advocate for Appellant : S. Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. I have heard the arguments of Mr. S.Venkataraman, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. V.R. Thangavelu, learned Government Advocate, taking notice for the respondents and have perused the records.2. In the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial