Advanced Search Results

Zunaid Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : VAT Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

H.L. Dattu, Anil R. Dave, JJ.1. By this application, the applicants, who are appellants/petitioners in Civil Appeals @ SLP(C) Nos.13848-13868/2010 have prayed for incorporation of certain requests made in para nos.4 and 6 of the application....

Ajit Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16(1, 4 and 4A), 142 and 335; Punjab Secretariat Class III Service Rules, 1976 - Rules 7(1) and 9; Civil Secretariat Service, Class II Service Rules, 1963 - Rules 8(2) and 10; Punjab Civil Secretariat(Class I) Rules, 1974; Haryana Education Department(State Service, Group B) Rule, 1980 - Rules 9(3) and 11; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 115(7)

Reported in : AIR1999SC3471; JT1999(7)SC153; 2000(1)MPHT1; 1999(II)OLR(SC)401; 1999(5)SCALE556; (1999)7SCC209; [1999]Supp2SCR521; (2000)1UPLBEC195

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor General,; Harish N. Salve,;

ORDERM. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. We have before us these three Interlocutory Applications Nos. 1 to 3 filed for 'clarification' by the State of Punjab in Civil Appeal Nos. 3792-94 of 1989 (Ajit Singh Januja and Ors....

V. Sudeer Vs. Bar Council of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2(1), 7, 17(2), 24(3), 34(1) and 49(1)&(2); Bar Council of India Training Rules, 1995 - Rule 9, 15 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32 and 145; Government of India Act, 1935; India Stamp Act, 1899; Bar Council of India (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 18 and 21

Reported in : AIR1999SC1167; 1999(2)ALT25(SC); 1999(47)BLJR1578; 1999(2)CTC72; (1999)3GLR2135; JT1999(2)SC141; 1999(2)KLT73(SC); 1999(2)SCALE32; (1999)3SCC176; [1999]1SCR1048; 1999(1)LC7

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Vaidyanathan, Additional Solicitor General,; Joseph Vellapally, A.C.,;

S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted in the Special Leave Petitions.2. These Writ Petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India as well as the two special leave petitions being S.L.P.(C) Nos. 13755 of 1996 and...

Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Municipal Corpora ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (DMC Act) - Sections 349A, 99

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan; Mr. Sandeep Sethi; Mr. Maninder Singh; Mr. Manjul Bajpai; Mr. Ashish Yadav, Advs.

1. These writ petitions impugn Office Order dated 20 th November, 2003, Circular dated 7 th February, 2008 and the Office Order dated 8th April, 2010 of the respondent MCD levying fee and stipulating other conditions...

idea Cellular Ltd Vs. Uoi and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocate and Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Aneesh Patniak, Mr. Sandeep Singh, and Mr.Navin Cha

S.B. Sinha The petitioner is a licensee; the license having been granted by the respondent herein in terms of Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 on or about 27.02.2008 with effect from 25.01.2008. Indisputably,...

The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Chief Secretary and ors. Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 131 and 226; Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2003 - Sections 18, 19, 46, 60, 60(4), 60(5), 60(6) and 60(7); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 195 and 321

Reported in : 2004(1)CTC641

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Counsel assisted by I. Subramanian, Public Prosecutor, ;V. Raghupathi, Government Pleader, ;S. Jayakumar, Additional Public Prosecutor and ;C. Manishankar, Special Public Prosec

ORDERB. Subhashan Reddy, C.J.1. In Writ Petition No. 1238 of 2004, the constitutionality of Sub-Sections 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Section 60 of Prevention of Terrorism (Amendment) Act, 2003 (Central Act 4 of 2004) is...

Kumarina Investment Ltd Vs. Digital Media Convergence Ltd. and Another

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : FOR THE PETITIONER: C.S. VAIDYANATHAN, SR. ADVOCATE, MANJUL BAJPAI, ASHISH YADAV ADVOCATES. FOR THE RESPONDENTS: MANINDER SINGH, SR. ADVOCATE, MRS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, MS. NITYA THAKUR, ARJUN NATRAJAN,

S. B. Sinha Introduction: An interesting question involving ‘choice of law’ and ‘choice of forum’ choosing the English law of contract and London courts as the forum, under a contract entered into by and between the...

M. Ahamedkutty Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1), 9 and 9(1); Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Customs Act

Reported in : 1990(47)ELT188(SC); JT1990(1)SC143; (1990)2SCC1; [1990]1SCR209

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Setia;C.S. Vaidyanathan an; K.V. Viswanathan, Advs

K.N. Saikia, J.1. Special leave granted.2. After the Appellant landed at Trivandrum Airport from Abu Dhabi, he was intercepted by the customs officials detecting that he smuggled 13 gold sheets weighing 1280 gms. valued at Rs.4,26,240...

R. Parangusam Vs. Chief Electrical Inspector and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)47; (1997)IILLJ1067SC; 1996(5)SCALE697; (1996)10SCC55; [1996]Supp3SCR801

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Vaidyanathan, Senior Adv

ORDER1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. We requested Shri C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned senior counsel to assist the appellant. We have heard the arguments for the State and also Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan. The Tribunal in the impugned order,...

V. Parameswara Iyer Vs. Canara Bank

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingCompany

Reported in : [2000]101CompCas424(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Vaidyanathan, Adv. for;Row and Reddy,;R. Vaigai and;M. Gnana Sekar, Advs.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order of the first respondent confirming the order of the second respondent imposing punishment of censure and ordering recovery of a sum of Rs....