Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s v subramanyam · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.079 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 18 2002

Rajeshwari Metallurgicals Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial T ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-18-2002

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 22(3A); ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : [2003]129STC344(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J. 1. Sri T.K. Vedamurthy, learned Government Pleader, is directed to take notice.2. Though this writ petition is posted for preliminary hearing, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 2005

itc Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-08-2005

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1966 - Sections 2(1), 2(5), 2(12A), 2(14A), 2(18), 2(18A), 2(19), 2(19A), 2(20), 2(21), 2(22), 2(23), 2(28), 2(32), 2(33), 2(34), 2(40), 2(48), 2(50), 2(52), 4, 5, 8, 8(1), 8(3), 65, 65(2), 65(3), 65A and 66; Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 2004 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2005Kant330; 2005(4)KarLJ359

Advocate for Appellant : Shanthi Bhushan, Sr. Counsel, for ;A. Rama and ;D. Venkatesh, Advs. in W.P. No. 39753 of 2004, ;Subash B. Adl., Adv. in W.P. Nos. 31351 to 31354, 29958 to 29986, 32728, 32729, 43871, 47640 of 2004 and

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. All these petitions are by persons who have dealings in the notified agricultural produce, as the expression occurs within the meaning of Sub-section (28) of Section 2 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1999

Satwik Drugs Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Dec-31-1999

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2000)(118)ELT666Tri(Chennai)

1. By this application for condonation of delay, the appellants have sought for condonation of two months and 21 days. The reason given is that the appellants had engaged one Sri S.V. Subramanyam, advocate and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 1968

M. Gurumurthappa Vs. Commissioner, Corporation of the City of Bangalor ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-21-1968

Subject : CriminalProperty

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; Bangalore Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 403

Reported in : AIR1969Mys160; 1969CriLJ622; (1968)2MysLJ532

ORDER1. This is a revision petition directed against the order dated 6-12-1967 made by the second Magistrate, Bangalore, in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 26 of 1967 on the file of his Court. The petitioner was the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1991

Veena Organics (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-30-1991

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1992)(59)ELT87TriDel

1. Being aggrieved with the Adjudication Order No. 17/90 dated 30-5-1990, passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad, M/s. Veena Organics (P) Ltd. have filed this appeal before the Tribunal.2. The appellant is engaged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 1996

Pushpanjali Touring Talkies Vs. Entertainment Tax Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-10-1996

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act - Sections 6(A)(3) and 6(A)(4)

Reported in : ILR1996KAR1967; 1997(42)KarLJ11

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. Rule. Heard both the parties.2. Petitioner is the exhibitor of cinematograph owning a theatre. He questions the validity of the order dated 4.11.1995 (Annexure-A) which has been passed under Section 6-A(3) read with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2002

B. Nagaraj Setty Sons Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-28-2002

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2002]127STC407(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. Sri Veda Murthy, learned Government Pleader, is directed to take notice for respondents.2. Though this petition is posted for preliminary hearing, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1950

Rukn-ul-mulk S. Abdul Wajid and ors. Vs. Gajambal Ramalingam and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-1950

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 228, 263, 264(1) and 273; Probate and Administration Act, 1881 - Sections 5, 25 and 50

Reported in : AIR1950Kant57; AIR1950Mys57

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

Balakrishnaiya, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiffs as executors of a will who applied to the Court of the District Judge, Bangalore, for grant of Letters of Administration with an authenticated copy of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1991

R. Ganesha Vs. H.R. Engineering Works and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-23-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas250(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. This application is filed by a creditor of the second respondent-company which is now ordered to be wound up. The circumstances in which the petition for winding up came to be filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 23 2004

Seema Alias Preeti Vs. Pramod Chandrakant Vernekar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-23-2004

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ572

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Subramanyam, Adv.

ORDERV.G. Sabhahit, J.1. This petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code is filed by the petitioner-wife seeking for transfer of the proceedings in M.C. No. 59 of 2003 pending on the file of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial