Advanced Search Results
P. Bravani Shankar and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.
Chennai
Aug-21-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)155CTR(Mad)402
ORDERP. SA THASHIVAM, J. :The petitioners numbering 16 who are employees of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Ranipet, aggrieved by the Circular dt. 12th Feb., 1990 of the third respondent have approached this Court for quashing the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vs. D. Swamy and Co. (P) Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-11-1997
Direct Taxation
(1999)153CTR(Mad)333
ORDERN. V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.At the instance of the Revenue, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961, for the opinion of this Court.'Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSpencer Consumer Products and Services Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central E ...
Chennai
Feb-03-1987
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35F
1988(34)ELT19(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. As against the impugned order, an appeal is competent. What Mr. S.V. Subramanian, learned counsel for the petitioner, would state is that the amount involved in large and further, Section 35F of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-25-1997
Direct Taxation
Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, 1962; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 36(1), 37, 37(1), 37(2A), 40A (7), 143(3), 144B and 256
(1997)139CTR(Mad)130; [1999]237ITR102(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The Tribunal, at the instance of the Revenue, has referred the following questions of law under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the opinion of this Court : '1. Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Seshasayee Bros. (P) Ltd.
Chennai
Feb-11-1997
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 5 and 28
[1999]239ITR471(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian and ;C.V. Rajan, Advs.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law for the opinion of this Court : '1. Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Subramaniam Bros.
Chennai
Feb-11-1997
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4 and 256(2)
[1999]236ITR148(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv. for ;C.V. Rajan
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. Pursuant to the direction given by this Court in T. C. P. No. 5 of 1982, dt. 26th April, 1982, the Tribunal, Madras, has stated a case and referred the following questions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Chennai
Jan-02-1997
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 37(2A)
[1998]233ITR779(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. At the instance of the CIT, Tamil Nadu-II, Madras, the Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.P. Madan Mohan
Chennai
Jan-11-1996
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(24), 28, 37(1) 56(2) and 57
[1996]222ITR1(Mad)
Deokinandan and ;S.V. Subramanian, Advs.
Thanikkachalam, J.1. At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question for the opinion of this court under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, 'the Act') : 'Whether, on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gnanambigai Mills
Chennai
Jan-29-1998
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 30 to 39, 40A(1) and 40A(7)
[1999]238ITR783(Mad)
S.V. Subramanian, Adv. for;C.V. Rajan, Adv.
Janarthanam, J. 1. These tax cases (references) are at the instance of the Revenue.2. The common question of law, as below is submitted by the Tribunal under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Minor Shanthi Chandran
Chennai
Apr-25-1999
Direct Taxation
(2000)158CTR(Mad)112
S. V. Subramanian, for C. V. Rajan, for the Revenue None, for the Assessee
ORDERR. Jayasimha Babu, J.The question referred to us is 'Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the provisions of section 49 of the Income Tax Act, the Tribunal is right...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »