Advanced Search Results

R. Jayasimha Reddy Vs. Government of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Encroachment Act - Sections 2 and 7; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 112

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD421; 2004(3)ALT205

Advocate for Appellant : K. Pratap Reddy, Adv.

ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The petitioner who is a resident of Beerolu Village, Tirumalayapalem Mandal in Khammam District, filed the writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents namely, Government of Andhra...

Sunder Agencies Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range, Thane, passed under section 158BC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') and pertains...

Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 33, 33(1), 34, 34(3) and 35B

Reported in : [1993]203ITR75(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Dalvi, Adv., i/b ;M/s. N. Chagla & Co., ;Dr. V. Balasubramaniam and ;P. S. Jetley, Advs.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1279 (NT)/1977.From the Judgment and Order dated 17.6.1976 of the Bombay High Court in I.T. Application No.63 of 1976. Mrs. A.K Verma, Mrs. S.V. Pathak (For J.B. Dadachanji &...

Hotel Dove Bird Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A and 17

Reported in : (1999)IIILLJ1348Bom

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Pathak and ;S.V. Pathak, Advs., i/b., Pathak Associates

V.V. Kamat, J.1. The petitioners M/s. Hotel Dove Bird have filed this petition making out the grievance with regard to the order (Exh. 'B'), which is in the nature of a demand under the provisions of...

Satyendra Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 16 and 48

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)242; 53(1994)DLT181; 1994(28)DRJ264; 1994RLR167

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Pathak and; K.K. Buchar, Advs

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) Petitioners in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seek to quash the whole of the acquisition proceedings in respect of their property at IX/3335, Kucha Bajrang Bali, Bazar Sita Ram,...

Harish Sakharam Savardekar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - 1(4); Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions (Amendment) Act, 1988

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR538; [1991(63)FLR111]; (1994)IIILLJ93Bom; 1991(1)MhLj289

Advocate for Appellant : N.M. Pathak and ;S.V. Pathak and ;S.S. Salvi, Advs. i/b ;Pathak and Associates

S.M. Daud, J. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution takes exception to an order for damages made under Section 14B of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952-hereinafter referred as 'the...