Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s v natu · Page 1 of about 28 results (0.077 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 2011

Syed MuzaffaruddIn Khan Mohd. Abdul Qayyum Vs. Mohd.Abdul Qadir Mohd. ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-14-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226, 227; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 156 (3), 195(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.V.Natu, Adv.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. This criminal writ petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.05.2011 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 2013

Vijaykumar and Others Vs. Manohar and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Aug-19-2013

Subject : MRTP

FACTS: 1. This appeal relates to the disputes amongst thetrustees/members of an educational trust registered under theprovisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act (hereinafter referredas to the "B.P.T. Act" for the sake of brevity). When the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 2006

Laxman Khanderao Ekhande Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-20-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 2(3) and 12

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR321; 2007(1)BomCR60; 2007(1)MhLj860

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Chaukidar, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos.7014, 7015, 7016, 7017, 7018, 7019 and 7020 of 2005

V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This group of petitions is being disposed of by common judgment since identical questions are involved therein. The petitioners are Head Master, Supervisor and Assistant Teachers having qualification of B.P.Ed. besides the degree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 14 2014

Dr. Shivdas Vs. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Higher and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Oct-14-2014

Subject : Education

S.V. Gangapurwala, J. 1. Heard. 2. Vide the present Writ Petition, the petitioner assails the entire selection process and appointments for the post of Assistant Professors in Respondent-College, pursuant to the advertisement dated 20.9.2011. 3. Mr.Gadhe,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1986

Ajabrao Sambhaji Bhagat Vs. Y.A. Khatke, Chairman, Pandt Staff Co-op. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 25, 25(2), 30, 30(1) and 30(2)

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ430Bom; 1986MhLJ371

1. On 24th March, 1986, I had passed the following order :-'Heard Mr. Bhagat, petitioner in person. Mr. S. V. Natu, Advocate, for respondent No. 1, Mrs. Bodade, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. None for respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 27 2012

Ashish S/O Jagannath Mali and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2012

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1] Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing with the consent of respective learned counsel for the parties. 2] By the present application filed by the applicants under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1989

Mahadeo and ors. Vs. Raghoba and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-21-1989

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115(1) and 115(2) - Order 20, Rules 6A and 12(1)

Reported in : 1990(1)BomCR787

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Natu, Adv.

M.M. Qazi, J.1. Mr. Bapat appearing for the non-applicant No. 2 has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the revision. As per the impugned order the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Yavatmal has determined the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 15 1974

Ramchandra Maroti and ors. Vs. the Collector (Land Acquisition Officer ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-15-1974

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31, 19 and 226; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - Sections 26, 27, 31, 39, 41, 45, 59 and 68

Reported in : AIR1975Bom281

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Natu and ;Kamborkar, Advs.

Dharmadhikari, J. 1. As all these writ petitioners relate to the lands comprised in one and the same Scheme, namely, Eastern Industrial Area Street Scheme, and were argued together, they are being disposed of by this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1990

Union of India Vs. Ashok Sukhadeo Singh Chavan

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-1990

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR1; 1991CriLJ2359

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.V. Natu, Adv.

Wahane, J.1. By this Criminal Appeal No. 150 of 1987, the Union of India, through the Assistant Collector, Custom and Central Excise, Division Amravati, Amravati, has challenged the acquittal of the respondent Ashok Sukhdeosingh Chavan. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1969

Dadarao Son of Kashiram and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1969

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 10(3), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(2), 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(4), 45(2), 46, 46(3) and 53; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 5; Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(4), 24B and 27; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) (Amendment) Act, 1951

Reported in : AIR1970Bom144; (1970)72BOMLR246; ILR1970Bom540; 1969MhLJ813

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Manohar and ;S.V. Natu, Advs.

Padhye, J. 1. The facts in the two cases slightly differ, but that does not make any difference in the legal position to be considered in these two cases and hence both these special civil applications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial