Advanced Search Results
Syed MuzaffaruddIn Khan Mohd. Abdul Qayyum Vs. Mohd.Abdul Qadir Mohd. ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-14-2011
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 226, 227; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 156 (3), 195(1)
Mr.S.V.Natu, Adv.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. This criminal writ petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.05.2011 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijaykumar and Others Vs. Manohar and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-19-2013
MRTP
FACTS: 1. This appeal relates to the disputes amongst thetrustees/members of an educational trust registered under theprovisions of the Bombay Public Trust Act (hereinafter referredas to the "B.P.T. Act" for the sake of brevity). When the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxman Khanderao Ekhande Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Secretar ...
Mumbai
Nov-20-2006
Service
Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Act, 1977; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 2(3) and 12
2007(1)ALLMR321; 2007(1)BomCR60; 2007(1)MhLj860
S.R. Chaukidar, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos.7014, 7015, 7016, 7017, 7018, 7019 and 7020 of 2005
V.R. Kingaonkar, J.1. This group of petitions is being disposed of by common judgment since identical questions are involved therein. The petitioners are Head Master, Supervisor and Assistant Teachers having qualification of B.P.Ed. besides the degree...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Shivdas Vs. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Higher and ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Oct-14-2014
Education
S.V. Gangapurwala, J. 1. Heard. 2. Vide the present Writ Petition, the petitioner assails the entire selection process and appointments for the post of Assistant Professors in Respondent-College, pursuant to the advertisement dated 20.9.2011. 3. Mr.Gadhe,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjabrao Sambhaji Bhagat Vs. Y.A. Khatke, Chairman, Pandt Staff Co-op. ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-1986
Labour and Industrial
Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 25, 25(2), 30, 30(1) and 30(2)
(1986)IILLJ430Bom; 1986MhLJ371
1. On 24th March, 1986, I had passed the following order :-'Heard Mr. Bhagat, petitioner in person. Mr. S. V. Natu, Advocate, for respondent No. 1, Mrs. Bodade, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. None for respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshish S/O Jagannath Mali and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-27-2012
Education
Oral Judgment: 1] Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and taken up for final hearing with the consent of respective learned counsel for the parties. 2] By the present application filed by the applicants under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadeo and ors. Vs. Raghoba and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-21-1989
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115(1) and 115(2) - Order 20, Rules 6A and 12(1)
1990(1)BomCR787
S.V. Natu, Adv.
M.M. Qazi, J.1. Mr. Bapat appearing for the non-applicant No. 2 has raised a preliminary objection about the maintainability of the revision. As per the impugned order the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Yavatmal has determined the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchandra Maroti and ors. Vs. the Collector (Land Acquisition Officer ...
Mumbai
Mar-15-1974
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31, 19 and 226; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - Sections 26, 27, 31, 39, 41, 45, 59 and 68
AIR1975Bom281
S.V. Natu and ;Kamborkar, Advs.
Dharmadhikari, J. 1. As all these writ petitioners relate to the lands comprised in one and the same Scheme, namely, Eastern Industrial Area Street Scheme, and were argued together, they are being disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Ashok Sukhadeo Singh Chavan
Mumbai
Feb-28-1990
Criminal
1990(2)BomCR1; 1991CriLJ2359
Mr. S.V. Natu, Adv.
Wahane, J.1. By this Criminal Appeal No. 150 of 1987, the Union of India, through the Assistant Collector, Custom and Central Excise, Division Amravati, Amravati, has challenged the acquittal of the respondent Ashok Sukhdeosingh Chavan. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDadarao Son of Kashiram and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. Overruled
Mumbai
Jul-24-1969
Tenancy
Tenancy Law; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 7, 8, 9, 10, 10(2), 10(3), 12, 12(1), 12(2), 13, 13(1), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(2), 18, 19, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(4), 45(2), 46, 46(3) and 53; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950; Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 5; Income-Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(4), 24B and 27; Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahal, Alienated Lands) (Amendment) Act, 1951
AIR1970Bom144; (1970)72BOMLR246; ILR1970Bom540; 1969MhLJ813
V.R. Manohar and ;S.V. Natu, Advs.
Padhye, J. 1. The facts in the two cases slightly differ, but that does not make any difference in the legal position to be considered in these two cases and hence both these special civil applications...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »