Advanced Search Results
P. Veeraswami Naidu (Died) and Another Vs. Pushpammal and Another
Chennai
May-30-1995
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 2, 7, 8, 54, 57, 59, 90 and 152; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 4 - Order 22, Rule 5
AIR1996Mad131
Mr. S.V. Jayaraman
ORDERA. R. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The short facts which are relevant for the purpose of the disposal of these appeals are as follows:-- The appellant Veeraswami Naidu instituted O.S. No. 28 of 1975 on the file...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEswaramurthy (Died), Vs. Muruga Gounder (Died),
Chennai
Apr-30-2002
Property
Transfer of Property Act - Sections 123; Evidence Act - Sections 68 and 70
(2002)2MLJ415
S.V. Jayaraman, Sr. Counsel for ;C. Ramanathan and ;Ettikkan, Advs., ;S. Vadivel, ;P. Guru Ramachandran, ;R. Nandakumar, ;S. Venugopal, ;V.C. Palaniswamy and ;R. Kalyanasundaram
ORDER1. There are four appeals and one cross-objection. (a) O.S. No.1290 of 1979 is filed by one Eswaramoorthy and others against Muruga Kounder and two others for partition. This suit was partially decreed. Against this, A.S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam Senniappa ...
Chennai
Apr-07-2005
CivilFamily
Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act - Sections 108; ;Indian Trusts Act; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 8, 14 and 14(1); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80, 80(2), 92, 104(1) - Order 1, Rule 8 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Hindu law
(2005)3MLJ149
T.R. Mani, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Duraiswamy, Adv. for Appellant No. 2 in A.S. No. 851 of 1989, ;V.K. Nachimuthu, Adv. for Appellant (died) No. 1 in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 and ;S.V. Jayaraman, Sr. Counsel
ORDERN.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. An interesting question of law arises in the appeal in A.S. No. 851 of 1989 regarding the character of the Will left by one Palaniappa Chettiar (testator) and his wife Chinnammal @ Rangammal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Saroja and ors. Vs. Chennimalai, Sivanmalai, Ramasamy and Marayammal
Chennai
Sep-18-2003
FamilyProperty
Evidence Act - Sections 71; Succession Act - Sections 63
2003(4)CTC330; (2003)3MLJ492
S.V. Jayaraman, Sr. Counsel for ;T.L. Murugamanickam, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. The two appeals are directed against the common judgment rendered by the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode in O.S. No. 930 of 1980 and O.S. No. 10 of 1986 dated 2.5.1986. A common...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Venkatasami Naidu Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Nov-09-1972
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961 - Sections 3(49), 5, 6, 9(2), 73 and 83; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115
AIR1974Mad124
Sri. S. V. Jayaraman
ORDER1. The State of Tamil Nadu, through the State representative (Land Reforms), the Authorised Officer, Land Reforms, Madurai 2 (the respondent herein) issued a notice dated 4-4-1970 under Section 9(2)(b) of the Tamil Nadu land Reforms...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeriaswamy Vs. the Special Tahsildar (Adi Dravidam Welfare) Vridhachal ...
Chennai
Sep-26-1983
PropertyConstitution
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6 and 17; Constitution of India - Article 31(2)
AIR1984Mad142
S.V. Jayaraman, Adv.
1. The facts leading to the Writ Petition, shortly, are as under: R. S. No. 272/10-B and R. S. No. 303/5-B Chinnaparur village, Vridhachalam taluk, South Arcot District, is a joint family property belonging to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.S. Pandian Vs. Annai Velanganni Films Rep. by Its Partner Mrs. Savit ...
Chennai
Apr-24-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 17 - Order 31, Rule 2
(2002)2MLJ591
S.V. Jayaraman, Senior. Adv.
ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard Mr.S.V.Jayaraman, learned senior counsel for the revision petitioner. No representation on behalf of the respondents. 2. The revision petitioner is the plaintiff in O.S.No. 4137 of 1996, filed for directing the respondents/defendants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPappayammal Vs. Palanisamy, Sellammal (Died) and Rukmani
Chennai
Apr-29-2005
CivilProperty
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 41, Rule 27
AIR2005Mad431; 2005(3)CTC292; (2005)3MLJ32
S.V. Jayaraman, Senior Counsel for N. Manokaran, Adv.
M. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Pappayammal, appellant herein, filed a suit for partition and separate possession against the defendants 1 and 2 and the said suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the said dismissal, she filed an appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaju Naicker and ors. Vs. Ekanathan and J. Thiruvengadam (Person of Un ...
Chennai
Apr-30-2004
PropertyFamily
Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 142 and 144; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 2, Rule 2
AIR2004Mad465
S.V. Jayaraman, Sr. Counsel for ;N. Maninarayanan, Adv.
N.V. Balasubramanian,J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the judgment of learned Single Judge rendered in A.S.No.44 of 1983 dated 17.3.1998. Learned Single Judge by the judgment allowed the appeal preferred against the judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSainson D. Vs. Railway Protection Force and ors.
Chennai
Jul-25-1997
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226
(1997)IILLJ1246Mad
S.V. Jayaraman, Adv.
A.R. Lakshmanan, J. 1. By consent of both parties the main Writ Appeal is taken up for disposal. The above appeal is directed against the order of the Learned Single Judge ated February 17, 1997 made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »