Advanced Search Results

L.R. Patel Family Trust Vs. Ito

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN720(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : J.D. Mistry and Atul K. Jasani for the Assessee R.V. Desai and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the decision of the department to re-open assessment vide impugned notice dated 28-3-2002 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, this petition has been moved under article 226 of the...

Caprihans India Ltd. Vs. Tarun Seem, Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN123(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Pardiwala, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Ms. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.Rule. Respondents waive service.2. By consent, writ petition is taken up for final hearing.3. Heard learned counsel on both sides. In this case, arguments were heard by us on 24-7-2003. After hearing the arguments,...

Mrs. Usha A. Kalwani Vs. S.N. Soni

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]136TAXMAN708(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.H. Patil and Satish Modi, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Respondent

V.C. Daga, J.This petition is directed against the order dated 3-11-1992 (Exhibit E) passed under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The facts leading to the present petition...

Cit Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN788(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue S.J Mehta and Ms. A. Vissanji, for the Assessee

S.H. Kapadia, J. At the instance of the department, the following two questions have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act concerning assessment year 1972-73.2. For the sake...

Twinstar Holdings Ltd. Vs. Anand Kedia

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]125TAXMAN656(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Chidambaram, F.B. Andhyarujina and J.D. Mistry, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetley, Mrs. S.V. Bharucha and T.C. Kaushik, for the Respondent

S.H. Kapadia, J.By this writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to challenge, inter alia, Notices dated 14-7-2002, 15-7-2002 and 15-7-2002 being Exhibit-J. 1 to Exhibit-J. 3 issued under section 226(5) read...

Amartaara Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)178CTR(Bom)199

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Pardiwalla with B.D. Damodar i/b Kanga & Co., for the Assessee R.V. Desai with P.S. Jetley & Mrs. S.V. Bharucha i/b T.C. Kaushik, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.This reference is made by the Tribunal under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the behest of the assessee. It concerns assessment year 1978-79, corresponding to the previous year ending 31-8-1977....

American Bureau of Shipping Vs. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]132TAXMAN93(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F.V. Irani, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue

S.H. Kapadia, J.At the instance of the assessee, two Questions of Law have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act concerning assessment year 1977-78 :'1. Whether the Tribunal...

In the Matter Of: Dhootpapeshwar Sales Corporation Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 434(1)

Reported in : [1972]42CompCas139(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : I.I. Mehta and S.V. Bharucha, Advs.

Kantawala, J. 1. Anna Balwant Dunang, the petitioner, has filed this petition for winding up of Dhootpapeshwar Sales Corporation Private Ltd. The ground on which the winding-up petition is presented is that the company is unable...

The Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Rural Deve ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2009)IVLLJ27Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Bharucha and ;Y.S. Bhate, Advs.

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. By way of this Petition, the Petitioners Union of India has challenged the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai dated 17th October 2000 by which order the Tribunal allowed...

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs Vs. Vinay Bele and Associates

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 76 and 80; Finance Act, 1994

Reported in : 2008[9]STR350

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Bharucha and; R.C. Master, Advs.

ORDER1. The main contention as urged on behalf of the revenue is that considering Section 76 of the Central Excise Act (sic)(Finance Act, 1994), the authorities had to impose the penalty as set out therein and...