Advanced Search Results
S.P. Narayanaswamy and anr. Vs. Kumaraiya thevar and ors.
Chennai
Jul-14-1999
Motor Vehicles
2000ACJ1570; (1999)3MLJ699
S. Uthirasamy, Adv.
M. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. The appellants are the claimants, the parents of the deceased. For the death of the deceased due to the negligent driving of the driver of the lorry belonging to the respondent No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBoopathy and Another Vs. State, by Inspector of Police, Erode
Chennai
Oct-24-1997
Criminal
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A
1998(1)ALT(Cri)436; 1998CriLJ2405; I(1999)DMC491
S. Uthirasamy, Adv.
ORDER1. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in C.C. No. 18/94 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Erode and the appellants in C.A. No. 43/94 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Erode are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.R.K. Natarajan Vs. P. Kumar
Chennai
Feb-06-1996
Commercial
Negotiable Instrument Act, 1882 -- Sections 138
1998(1)CTC305
Mr. D. Selvaraju, Adv.
ORDER1. Revision petitioner is the complainant in C.C.No.152 of 1993 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai. The respondent is the accused in that case. The learned trial Magistrate tried the respondent for an offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bay Leathers Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Saileela
Chennai
Feb-26-1998
BankingCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
1998(1)ALT(Cri)523; [2001]103CompCas792(Mad); 1998CriLJ3719
S. Uthirasamy, Adv.
M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The question that arises for consideration in this revision petition is whether the appellate court under Section 389(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, could suspend the sentence of fine, while admitting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.O. Rajammal Vs. the Commissioner, H.R. and C.E. Board, Nungambakkam, ...
Chennai
Sep-21-1993
Trusts and Societies
T.N. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 116(2) - Rules 9, 10 and 13
AIR1994Mad191
S. Uthirasamy, Adv.
ORDER1. The writ petition is for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the proceedings of the first respondent in Ref. Na. Ka. No. 52981/93(1) V2 dated 1-9-1993 and to direct the respondent,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSampathkumar Vs. Padmavathy and 2 ors.
Chennai
Feb-12-1996
CriminalFamily
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125
I(1997)DMC371
S. Uthirasamy, Adv.
M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. This revision has been preferred by the petitioner (husband) against the ex parte order of maintenance ordered in favour of respondents (wife and children) at the rate of Rs. 1,200/- p.m. for all...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›