Advanced Search Results

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/S. Wipro Net Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Limitation Act - Article 112; Constitution of India - Articles 239, 249; Consumer Protection Act; Arbitration Act, 1940; Telegraph Act - Section 7(B)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.Udayakumar, Adv.

1. The Civil Suit is filed for a judgment and decree, directing the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.36,87,082/- in respect of the Circuit Nos.10000124 and 10000125 installed by the plaintiff together with...

Commissioner of Customs (Sea) Vs. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appel ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 25(1), 28(1), 108, 110, 111 and 112; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8); Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4G; Customs Rules

Reported in : 2009(165)LC169(Madras); 2009(240)ELT166(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Udayakumar, Sr. Standing Counsel

T.S. Sivagnanam, J.1. Heard Mr. S. Udayakumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Customs and Mr. B. Sathish Sundar, learned Counsel for the second respondent.2. The above appeal has been filed against the order passed by...

The Regional Director, Ministry of Company Affairs and the Registrar o ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 95 to 97 and 391 to 394; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85

Reported in : [2008]141CompCas475(Mad); (2008)2CompLJ116(Mad); 2008(1)CTC273; (2008)1MLJ625; [2008]85STC30(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Udayakumar, Adv.

A.P. Shah, C.J.1. Admit. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondent waives service. By consent, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 2. The Regional Director, Ministry of Company Affairs and the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu...

M.Kumaran, and anr. Vs. J.Rajesh, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Udayakumar, Adv.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the unsuccessful second and third defendants against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2003 made in O.S.No.1698 of 1997, on the file of the II Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.2....

P. Arumugam (Died) and Others Vs. P. Narayansami and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: S. Udayakumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: D. Ravichander, Advocate.

(Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the order and final decree dated 06.8.2009 made in I.A.No.56 of 2007 in O.S.No.20 of 2005 on the file of Additional District Judge, Fast...

P. andiappan Vs. the District Collector

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:05. 10.2009 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice M.CHOCKALINGAM and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.SUBBIAH H.C.P.Nos.523, 640 and 711 of 2009 N.K.Jawahar Ali ..Petitioner in HCP.523/2009 Omari Iqbal ..Petitioner...

The Commissioner Vs. Bala Handloom

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:05. 10.2009 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice M.CHOCKALINGAM and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.SUBBIAH H.C.P.Nos.523, 640 and 711 of 2009 N.K.Jawahar Ali ..Petitioner in HCP.523/2009 Omari Iqbal ..Petitioner...

Smt.Geethalakshmi, .. Vs. the Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, a ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.B.Kumar, Adv.

1. These two Habeas Corpus Petitions have been filed against the preventive detention orders passed by the first respondent in respect of the detenus P.Hameed Mustaq and S.Tamilselvam @ Kumar respectively under section 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i)...

R.K. Ranganathan Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC282; 2003(156)ELT457(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sudhakar, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. R. Sudhakar, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr. V.T. Gopalan,...

The General Manager, BSNL, Salem and Others Vs. A. Arunachalm and Anot ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order, dated 12.03.2015 made in Original Application No.310/00263 of 2014, on...