Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s sundaresan · Page 1 of about 48 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 2012

Ms. Buhari Hotels and Motels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Chief Engineer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-31-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Development Control Rules - Rule 28; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Sundaresan, Adv.

Prayer:- W.P.No.17036 of 2012 has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to give Electricity Service Connection to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2009

Mrs. B. Maragathamani and ors. Vs. the Member Secretary Chennai Metrop ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-07-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 18; Evidence Act - Sections 85

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ484

Advocate for Appellant : M. Krishnappan, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Sundaresan, Adv.

ORDERD. Murugesan, J.1. The question raised in this writ petition is as to whether the first respondent C.M.D.A could insist for registered power of attorney when an application is filed through a power of attorney seeking...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. English Electric Co. of India Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-09-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]109TAXMAN401(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sundaresan, for the Revenue V. Ramachandran and Anitta Sumanth, for the Assessee

ORDERJayasimha Babu, J.The assessee is a manufacturer of electrical goods. Its accounts are maintained in mercantile system. For the assessment year 1984-85, it had valued its closing stock at cost. The valuation so made, according to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 07 2008

G.P. Venkatesa Mudaliar Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-07-2008

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 137B

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ702

Advocate for Appellant : N.S.M.Md. Jafarullah, ;A. Thiyagarajan, ;N. Nithianandam, ;M. Rajasekhar, ;S. Sundaresan, ;Siva Suyambu, ;Srinath Sridevan, ;B. Dayaalan, ;M. MD.Ibrahim Ali, ;K. Govi Ganesan, ;R. Hemalatha, ;M. Abdul

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. All the above petitions are filed challenging the Property Tax Notice for Current Demand and Arrear Demand. 2. All the petitioners in the above writ petitions are owners of the land mentioned in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1999

Kamak Plastics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]108TAXMAN273(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.P.S. Janarthana Raja, for the Assessee S. Sundaresan and C.V. Rajan. for the Revenue

ORDERThe writ petitions are for the issue of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the petitioner in C. No. 1241-II/42 to 44 of 1988 dated 2-11-1989, passed under section 264 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1999

K.T. Kunjumon Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Mad)341

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Balachandran

ORDERM. V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.The writ petition in WP No. 1425 of 1999 is filed against the order passed by the CIT Central-1, Chennai-34, dt. 18th Nov., 1998, and the prayer in the writ petition is to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1991

Mohd. Buhari Vs. Rahamathunissa

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 25

Reported in : I(1992)DMC474; (1991)IIMLJ160

Advocate for Appellant : V. Sairam, Adv.

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. In this Letters Patent Appeal, the parents of two minor Muslim girls are quarrelling as between themselves for the guardianship of the person and custody of the said minor girls. Though in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2003

S.G. Badrinath Vs. V. Jagannathan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-02-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(14), 24(1) and 115 - Order 14, Rule 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : AIR2004Mad161; (2004)1MLJ116

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Rajagopal, Sr. Counsel for ;R.N. Nandakumar, Adv.

ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. Plaintiff is the petitioner herein, who has filed the suit in O.S. No. 1279 of 1998 on the file of Sub-Court, Coimbatore, for recovery of Rs. 29,64,000/-, with interest and costs, against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 2016

T. Udayakumar Vs. B. Natarajan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-23-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the orders and decreetal orders dated 18.03.2014 made in I.A.Nos.161 and 162 of 2012 in O.S.No.134 of 2007 by the learned District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2026

G.N.Senthil Kumar @ Senthil Sambavan Vs The Commissioner of Police-Tam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-17-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 17.03.2026CORAM :THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR G.N.Senthil Kumar (a) Senthil Sambavan, S/o.G.Nagappan, Represented by Power Agent, R.K.Purushotham .. PetitionerVersus1. The Commissioner of Police - Tambaram, Office of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial