Advanced Search Results
Thulasi Ammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Secrertary to ...
Chennai
Jul-22-1994
Civil
(1994)2MLJ662
Mr. M.S. Subramanian
ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The petitioners in all the above writ petitions prayed for the issue of a writs of declaration declaring that the words 'on the date of publication of the Notification under Section 4(1)' of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Raju Reddiar and anr. Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Represen ...
Chennai
Sep-06-1995
Commercial
(1995)2MLJ561
Mr. V.S. Subramanian, Mr. V.S. Subramaniam
AR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. The plaintiffs, who succeeded in part before the learned single Judge of this Court, are the appellants in the above appeal and the respondents in the memorandum of cross objections filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.G. Vivekanandan and ors. and Archean Granites Ltd. Vs. R.P.S. Benefi ...
Chennai
Apr-30-2002
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 531A and 536; Income-tax Act
[2003]115CompCas649(Mad); (2006)2CompLJ134(Mad); [2004]49SCL671(Mad)
V.S. Subramanian, Adv.;Chinnasamy, Adv.;Latha Parimalavadana, Adv.;P.L. Narayanan, Adv.
E. Padmanabhan, J.1. Application No. 2047 of 2000 has been taken out in C. P. No. 233 of 1999 by Archean Granites Ltd. praying this court to hold that the sale deed executed by R. P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arunachala Mudaliar Vs. Jayalakshmi Ammal and V.R. Rajasekharan
Chennai
Jan-09-2003
ContractProperty
Letters Patent Act
AIR2004Mad180; 2003(1)CTC355; (2003)1MLJ626
M.S. Subramanian, Adv.
Prabha Sridevan, J. 1. The second respondent/first defendant owned the suit property. The appellant / second defendant claims to have purchased the property bona fide on 22-04-1982. Ex-B4 is the sale deed and Ex-B5 is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunusami Mudaliar (Died) and ors. Vs. Thanikajalam and ors.
Chennai
Dec-10-1985
Family
(1986)1MLJ323
Mr. M.S. Subramanian
S. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The first defendant in four suits on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Vellore was the original appellant in these four second appeals. He died and his legal representatives were brought...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.S. Ramamurthy and Company a Firm Represented by Its Sole Proprietor ...
Chennai
Sep-29-1981
Civil
(1982)1MLJ191
Mr. M. Section Subramanian, Mr. M.S. Subramanian
ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The respondent herein obtained a decree against the petitioner herein in A.S. No. 89 of 1967 on the file of the Bombay City Civil Court. The decree got transferred to the file...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Ramaswamy Vs. P.M. Agencies Represented by Its Managing Partner, P. ...
Chennai
Jul-16-1993
Civil
(1994)2MLJ328
Mr. M.S. Subramanian
ORDERSwamidurai, J.1. The defendant/respondent in I.A. No. 482 of 1988 in O.S. No. 326 of 1985 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Ootacamund, is the petitioner. The respondent herein is the plaintiff. The plaintiff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Elementary School, Pundarikulam North Bank, Rep by Its Corres ...
Chennai
Apr-17-2004
Tenancy
Rent Control Act - Sections 8, 8(5) and 10(2)
2004(3)CTC712; (2004)2MLJ523
M.S. Subramanian, Adv.
ORDERM. Thanikachalam, J.1. The tenant, who was successful in resisting the eviction petition before the Rent Controller, unable to sustain the same when the same was challenged before the Rent Control Appellate Authority, is the revision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.N. Srinivasa Gopalan Vs. V. Siva Sankaran
Chennai
Mar-01-2002
FamilyProperty
Hindu Succession Act; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 30
(2002)2MLJ210
M.S. Subramanian, Adv.
K. Sampath, J. 1. The plaintiff in O.S.No.464 of 1981 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Chengalput, is the appellant in the second appeal. 2. He filed the suit against the respondent herein for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Loganathan Vs. the Special Tahsildar, A.D.W.
Chennai
Dec-12-1995
Property Civil
(1996)1MLJ442
Mr. M.S. Subramanian
ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Heard Mr. M.S. Subramanian, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.R. Rajasekaran, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondent as per the direction of the courts. Since the matter arises...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »