Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s shivaswamy · Page 1 of about 75 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 1992

Chairman, Bda Vs. Shivanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-30-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 5; Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 39; Bangalore Development Authority Act - Sections 17(1) and 17(5)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1504; 1992(3)KarLJ96

Advocate for Appellant : H.B. Datar, Sr. Adv. for ;N.S. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDERRama Jois, J.1. The facts of this Review Petition show how inadvertance, negligence and dereliction of duty on the part of the Advocate appearing for a public authority and the officers of the Authority could create...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2010

The Divisional Personnel Officer, Divisional Office (Personnel Branch) ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2010

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 4(1), 7(3)A and 7(7)

Advocate for Appellant : V.G. Sureshkumar, Adv.

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. 'It has been our sad experience to find employers trying to stifle the efforts of employees in their legitimate claims seeking benefits under the Industrial Law by tiring them out in adjudication proceedings...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2014

Sri R Shankaran Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF JULY, 2014 BANGALORE BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.32186 OF2010(LA-BDA) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION Nos.32187/2010 & 34096-34098 OF2010WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 10 1971

S. Janab Vs. Corporation of the City of Bangalore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-10-1971

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(6), 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR1972Kant109; AIR1972Mys109; (1971)2MysLJ491

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

Narayana Pai, C.J.1. The petitioner who runs a mutton stall at No. 65, Markam Road. Ashok Nagar, Bangalore, assails the validity of a licence granted to respondent 4 to run a similar mutton stall in No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1998

R. Shankaregouda Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Bangalore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-11-1998

Subject : Excise

Acts : Karnataka Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusements (Bangalore City) Order, 1989; Karnataka Excise Licences (General Conditions) Rules, 1967 - Rules 9 and 11; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 2(14) and 31; Karnataka Excise Licences (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968; Controlling of Places of Public Amusements, (Bangalore City) Order, 1989

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3141; 1998(3)KarLJ494

Advocate for Appellant : Sri A. Jagannatha Shetty, ;Sri S. Shekar Shetty, ;Sri S. Shivaswamy, ;Sri K.N. Subba Reddy, ;Sri C. Anandkurar and ;M/s. Kumar and Kumar, Advs.

ORDER1. Can the Licensing Authority exercising powers under the Licensing and Controlling of Places of Public Amusements (Bangalore City) Order, 1989, refuse a licence on the ground that the grant would offend the provision of any...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 1977

Meghraj and ors. Vs. B. Seshagiri Rao

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-28-1977

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106

Reported in : AIR1977Kant163; ILR1977KAR881; 1977(1)KarLJ266

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDER1. The sole question raised in this revision petition relates to the validity of the quit notice issued by the petitioners.2. The facts which are not now in dispute are:The respondent has taken the premises for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1980

Mahababoob Transport Company Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-20-1980

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mining Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 54 and 58

Reported in : AIR1981Kant30

Advocate for Appellant : Govind Swamynathan, Adv. for S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDERIn this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the order dated 26-12-1974 passed by tit e Central Government in exercise of its power under Rule .54...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1988

Manick Enterprises Vs. Haji Sulaiman

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-29-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1078; 1988(2)KarLJ216

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This matter coming up for orders on I.A.1, is disposed of finally after hearing the Counsel for the parties.2. The Revision petitioner suffered an ex parte order of eviction in a proceeding for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1995

Godrej K. Divecha and ors. Vs. Corporation of City of Bangalore and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-05-1995

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 12(2) and 21; Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 505

Reported in : ILR1997KAR7

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDERG.P. Shivaprakash, J.1 The petitioners who belong to the same family claim to be the owners of a certain apartment in a building known as 'Ahuja Palace' bearing No. 96, Richmond Road, Bangalore. The said building...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2001

Mohammed Ibrahim Vs. Dist. Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolar an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-09-2001

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24

Reported in : AIR2002Kant176

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shivaswamy, Adv.

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J1. Petitioner is running a paddy husking industry. A back billing demand notice as per Annexure-E dated 21-6-1999 was issued to the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 82,128/- in respect of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial