Advanced Search Results

Sri Devaraj Vs. Smt Dayarathini

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. S.Shaker Shetty

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF MARCH, 2020 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.380 OF2005BETWEEN Sri Devaraj Aged about 63 years S/o Late...

A.K. Mohideen and anr. Vs. N.M. Krishna Chettiar and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1985Kant240; ILR1985KAR2239; 1985(2)KarLJ367

Advocate for Appellant : S. Shaker Shetty, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent of learned Counsel, this civil revision petition directed against order dt. 30th Aug. 1983 made on I.A. XI in O. S. No. 388 of 1977 (O. S. No, 1767 of 1980) by the...

Champalal Bhandari Son of Late Bhimaraj Bhandari. Vs. Settappa Son of ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Kamataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 - Section 5; Karnataka Land Revenue Code, 1888 - Rule 43(8), 43(5)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri S Shaker Shetty; Sri A Anil Kumar Shetty, Advs.

ORDER 1. People purchasing an agricultural land granted in favour of a person belonging to depressed class/scheduled caste community, should keep their eyes open and examine legally as to whether it is possible to get any...

High Court of Karnataka Vs. Sri Jai Chaitanya Dasa @ Jayanarayana K

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 16th day of April, 2015 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA C.C.C. (CRIMINAL) No.20/2009 BETWEEN: High Court of...

Smt. Ragini Narayan W/O Late B.S. Narayan Vs. Smt. Minnie Narayan

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Evidence Act - Sections 116; Indian Contract Act - Sections 25; Karnataka Rent Control Act; Registration Act - Sections 49; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 11

Reported in : ILR2008(2)KAR1955; 2008(1)KCCR194; 2008(2)AIRKarR208; 2008AIHC1666(Kar).

Advocate for Appellant : Udaya Holla, Sr. Adv.

V. Jagannathan, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No. 5110/03 by the trial court by which the learned judge had decreed the suit of the plaintiff for ejectment of...

Smt Suchitra vs Smt Pushpalatha

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 558 OF 2024 (SC) C/W CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 560...

Mr Hashim Yusuf Sait vs M/S M V Group

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 530 OF 2024 C/W CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 554 OF...

Mr K J Ramesh vs Mr K J Raghavendra

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 182 OF 2025 BETWEEN:1. MR K J RAMESH S/O SRI...

Hmt Ltd. Vs. N.T. Rahamatulla Khan and Associates

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Company

Acts : Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - Section 4; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 424G, 433 and 483

Reported in : [2010]155CompCas169(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Joshua H. Samuel, Adv. for Cariappa and Co.

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Though this appeal has come up for orders on the applications for vacating stay, with the consent of learned-counsel for the parties, the main matter itself is taken up for disposal.2. This...

Mrs. Padmavathy W/O G. Thamotkaran Vs, Mrs. P. Kamalamma W/O Late C. P ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 58; Limitation Act, - Section 10

Advocate for Appellant : SRI S. SHAKAR SHETTY. ADV

1. The first plaintiff is in appeal questioning the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Judge in O.S.No. 10627/1995 dismissing the suit for partition and separate possession.2. Incidentally, we notice that the suit was...