Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s sethuratnam · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 1994

K. Nachimuthu Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-1994

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2760

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sethuratnam, ;Sr. Counsel, for M. Md. Ibrahim Ali and ;S. Silambanan, Adv.

1. The accused has been convicted under section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(1)(e) read with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2003

N. Karpagam, Vs. P. Deivanaiammal @ Deivathal @ Deivathayee Ammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-2003

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2003Mad219; (2003)1MLJ550

Advocate for Appellant : S. Thangavel, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur, dated 20-12-2002, directing the Inspector of Police, Vangal to provide police protection to the petitioner therein/respondent herein, the petitioners/respondents therein preferred the above...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1998

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Rep. by Its Chairman, Madras and 2 Other ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-1998

Subject : Direct taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 -- Sections 2 (1-A); Income Tax Act, 1922

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC426; (2001)3MLJ178

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S. Sethuraman,;Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Sounthar

ORDER1. Since the issue involved in all these appeals is one and the same, the appeals are taken up for joint disposal.2. In S.A.Nos. 95 and 96 of 1998 notice of motion was ordered on 28.1.98....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 10 2003

Thirumalaiswami and Two ors. Vs. Nallathambi (Died) and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2003(2)CTC526; (2003)2MLJ756

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Muthusamy, Sr. Counsel for ;M.M. Sundaresh and ;V. Bharadidasan, Advs. in A.S. Nos. 441 of 1986 & 977 of 1994 and ;T.R. Rajaraman, Adv. in A.S. No. 756 of 1988

ORDERP. Shanmugam, J. 1. The defendants in O.S.No. 50 of 1983 are the appellants in A.S. No. 441 of 1986 and A.S.No. 977 of 1994. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 9 of 1984 is the appellant in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1998

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bommakkal and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-13-1998

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 103A; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 157

Reported in : 2000ACJ1500; [1998]94CompCas819(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. New India Insurance Company Limited has filed the above review application under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the order made in C.M.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 1994

K. Sengodan Vs. K. Dharmalingam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-22-1994

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ336

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.K. Muthusami

A.R. Lakshmanan, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S. No. 156 of 1983 on the file of Sub Court, Namakkal, is the appellant in the above appeal. He died during the pendency of the appeal and his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1969

Kalianna Gounder Vs. Palani Gounder and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1969

Subject : Contract

Reported in : AIR1970SC1942; 1970MhLJ33(SC); (1970)1SCC56; [1970]2SCR455

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Chagla,; M.K. Ramamurthi,; .S. Sethuratnam,;

J.C. Shah, J.1. Palani Gounder and his son T. P. Sengottaiah- hereinafter collectively called 'the defendants''-own Survey No. 765-B in Kugallur village. Kalianna Gounder-hereinafter called 'the plaintiff'-agreed on July 4, 1956 to purchase from the defendants...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1962

R. Subbaraya Gounder (Died) and ors. Vs. K.R. Eswaramoorthy Gounder

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-03-1962

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34; Madras Indebted Agriculturists (Temporary Relief) Act, 1954 - Sections 5; Madras Indented Agriculturists (Repayment of Debts) Act, 1955 - Sections 8; Madras Indebted Agriculturists (Temporary Relief) Ordinance, 1953 - Sections 5; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 14 and 19

Reported in : AIR1963Mad202

Advocate for Appellant : R. Gopalaswami Iyengar and ;S. Sethuratnam, Advs.

Ganapatia Pillai, J. 1. This appeal is preferred by the first defendant in O. S. No. 54 of 1958 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. That suit was brought by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1974

Arumugha Gounder Vs. Ardhanari Mudaliar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-04-1974

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955 - Sections 2 and 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 40, Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1975Mad231

Advocate for Appellant : S. Sethuratnam and ;S. Balasubramaniam, Advs.

1. This reference raises an interesting question as to whether a tenant let into possession of land and incidental immovable property by a Receiver appointed by Court pending a suit would be entitled to protection under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1957

In Re: Marappa Goundar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-1957

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 18 - Schedule - Article 95; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 90

Reported in : AIR1959Mad26; (1958)IMLJ260

Advocate for Appellant : S. Mohan Kumaramangalam and ;S. Sethuratnam, Advs.

ORDERRamaswami, J.1. This is a Revision sought to be preferred against the order made by the learned District Munsif of Coimbatore in E. A No 1247 of 1956 in E. P. No. 77 of 1956 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial