Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s s ray · Page 1 of about 149 results (0.161 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 1999

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.In Re: Inder Mohan Bensiwa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : AIR1999SC2583; JT1999(5)SC114; 1999(4)SCALE267; (1999)6SCC237; [1999]3SCR1173; 1999(2)LC1254(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium,; S.S. Ray,; M.C. Mehta,;

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.1. The applicant in IA No. 481 is Sri Inder Mohan Bensiwal who is an allottee of a retail outlet dealership for Petrol from the Hindustan Petroleum Ltd. (8th respondent) (hereinafter called 'HPCL')...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2006

Hadu Sundara Vs. Uma Sundara

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-29-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 5

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR396

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Parichha, J.1. Heard2. The petitioner, who is the defendant No. 1 in Title Suit No. 226 of 2006 of the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhubaneswar, has filed this revision challenging the legality...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2002

Century Textile and Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-22-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226 and 227; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 173Q and 209(2); Central Excixe Act, 1944 - Sections 11A(1) and 11AC; Cost Accounting Records Textile Rules, 1977; Central Excise Act - Sections 35L

Reported in : 2003(85)ECC610; 2003(154)ELT52(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray, Learned Sr. Adv., i/b., ;S.N. Kohali, Adv.

A.K. Gohil, J. 1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for seeking the following, among other, reliefs in the petition:(i) An order, direction or writ in the nature...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 22 1996

Bansilal Farms Vs. Umarani Bose and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953; West Bengal Land Reforms Act - Sections 2(7), 3(1), 3A and 14; West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1996(8)SCALE513; (1997)9SCC191; [1996]Supp9SCR131

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray,; Harish Salve and; G. Ramaswamy, Sr. Advs.,;

G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. These three appeals by special leave are directed against one and same judgment dated 25.09.1992 of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court. The three appellants are the State of West...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 31 2004

M.S. Associates Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-31-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131, 132 and 132(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1922; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 75; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray, P. Agarwal, K.N. Choudhury and S. Shyam, Advs. in W. P. (C) Nos. 137, 1552, 6965, 7008 of 2000 and 2889, 2890, 8647 and 8648 of 2001, P. Upadhaya and S.C. Singha, Advs. in W. P. (C.) No

D. Biswas, J.1. The above mentioned writ petitions have been filed before this court by the writ petitioners disputing the legality and validity of the search and seizure operations carried out, by the respondent authorities on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2006

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-05-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Aligarh Muslim University (Amendment) Act, 1981 - Sections 2(1), 5(2), 8, 16, 17, 18, 20A, 21, 22, 23, 26, 26A, 27, 28, 29, 31, 34 and 35; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 2, 3, 5(9A), 6, 8, 12(2) 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(5), 14, 15, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, 29, 28(1), 28(2), 30, 30(2), 32, 32(1), 36, 36(2), 40 and 40(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(28); Constitution of India - Articles 26, 28(2), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 32, 226, 245 and 246; Gujarat Panchayat Act, 1961 - Sections 11(1); Kerala University Act, 1969 - Sections 48 and 49; Gujarat University Act, 1949 - Sections 33A

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Singh,; Sunita Agarwal,; S.S. Ray,; Rajeev Dhavan,; Ashok Khare and; S.A. Shah, Advs.

Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J.1. The short basic issue in all these appeals is whether the Aligarh Muslim University is a minority Institution. The point arises because suddenly some eighty five years after incorporation, they chose for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2003

Paramount Bio-tech Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-25-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11A, 11AA, 11(2), 12, 12(1B), 12(2), 16, 16(1), 20, 24, 27 and 30 ; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Scheme) Regulations, 1999 - Regulations 5 and 12; Companies Act, 1956; Income-Tax Act, 1961; Indian Trusts Act, 1882; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(h); Security Laws (Amendment) Act, 1999; Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 292A

Reported in : [2004]120CompCas18(All); (2004)2CompLJ446(All); [2004]49SCL77(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M.A. Kazami, and ;S.S. Ray, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for a writ of ceriorari for quashing the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations, 1999 notified on 15-10-1999 (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 31 2001

Atique Ahmed and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-31-2001

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act - Sections 7; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3 and 14; Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribes Act - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 226 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 155(2), 156, 156(1), 156(3), 157, 161 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 147, 148, 149, 182, 211, 323, 352, 365, 380, 386, 406, 448, 467, 500, 504 and 506

Reported in : 2002CriLJ132

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray, ;S.M.A. Qazmi and ;Daya Shankar Misra, Advs.

ORDER1. All these three writ petitions which are being heard together have been placed today for further hearing.2. In Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2001 the prayer of the petitioner Atique Ahmad, who happens...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1982

Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. the Madhya Pradesh Electrici ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-23-1982

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 22B; Madhya Pradesh Electricity Generation, Control and Consumption Order, 1975; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR1983MP93

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Ray, ;J.P. Gupta, ;A.K. Chitale, ;A. Bhatnagar and ;A. Sharma, Advs.

J.S. Verma, J.1. The petitioner No.1, Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. is an existing company within the meaning of the Companies Act. 1956, and having its registered office at Birlanagar, Gwalior, in the State of Madhya Pradesh....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1990

Gajanan Narayan Patil and Others Vs. Dattatraya Waman Patil and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1990

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 2(7), 27(9) and 73ID; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 57-A;

Reported in : AIR1990SC1023; I(1990)BC400(SC); (1990)92BOMLR332; [1990]69CompCas1(SC); JT1990(1)SC517; 1990(1)SCALE305; (1990)3SCC634; [1990]1SCR491; 1990(2)LC174(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Jain,; S.S. Ray,; B.A. Mansodkar,;

ORDERB.C. Ray, J.1. This is an appeal under Article 133 of the Constitution of India against the Judgment and Order dated October 26, 1989 passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 3976...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial