Advanced Search Results

M/s. India Cements Investments Services Limited, Represented by its As ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(Prayer: Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to set aside the order dated 08.11.2013 passed by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Court Judge, Namakkal in C.A.No.1/13 and to confirm...

Beardsell Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)65TTJ(Mad)288

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Mani, for the Appellant., S. Ganapathy l`yer, for the Respondent

ORDER--Book profits computed under s. 115J without considering revaluation of investmentRatio & Held:The power of revision under section 263 can be exercised by the Commissioner when the following factors co-exist : (a) there should be a...

G.Rajendran vs State of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 14-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR1. G.Rajendran37, P.V.S.Nagar, Polur Road, Thiruvannamalai Dist. 2.A.Pappammal Hig 263, Mirutham, New Housing Unit, Thanjavur-5, Thanjavur Dist. 3.N.Sreegayathiridevi 2-b-4th West Main Road, Anna...

Shri N.S.S. Mani and ors. Vs. Delhi Gymkhana Club Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 56(1994)DLT456

Advocate for Appellant : Vikramjit Sen and; Ashok Sagar, Advs

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. Through an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC, the plaintiffs seek an injunction in the mandatory form commanding the defendant Delhi Gymkhana Club Ltd. to permit the four plaintiffs...

Sabu.V.S vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 26TH CHAITHRA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER IN CC 793/2005 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF...

M.Vijayakumar vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 12-12-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI1. M.Vijayakumar2. A.Natarajan3. K.Santhakumar4. P.Masilamani5. N.Gunasekaran6. P.Ganesh7. A.Murugesan8. K.Velliangili9. R.Periyasamy 10.T.Athavan 11.J.Gunasekaran 12.N.Ramesh ...Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Government Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By Its Secretary...

Pichaipillai Vs. Venkatachalam

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05. 08-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. PALANIVELU S.A.No.1483 of 1994 Pichaipillai ... Appellant/Appellant/2nd defendant vs. 1.Venkatachalam ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/plaintiff 2.Anbalagan 3.Mynavathi ... 2nd &...

The Income Tax Officer Ward-4(3)(3), vs Shobha Sathyanarayan

Court : Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MAY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT APPEAL NO. 431 OF 2026 (T-IT)...

Commissioner of Customs and Vs. Sudarshan Tex-port (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

1. Heard both sides. The Commissioner (Appeals) has allowed refund to the respondents amounting to Rs. 52,913/-and Rs. 49,223/- respectively.The relevant notification allows such refunds subject to the condition that drawback is not availed by the...

Bimal Kumar JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Shri S.S. Mani, Consultant appeared on behalf of the appellant and Shri A. Chopra, Ld. JDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue.2. The Ld. Consultant submitted that a penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs has been...