Advanced Search Results
Gurudas Balkrishna Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panaji-goa
Mumbai
Oct-16-1992
Criminal
1993(2)BomCR27; (1993)95BOMLR60; 1994CriLJ444; 1993(2)MhLj1082
S.S. Kantak (as Amicus Curiae), Adv.
ORDER1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 2. Applicant in person has filed this application praying for transfer of a criminal case which he has filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Panaji and for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Esmeralda Rosario and Others Vs. Shri Cornelio Pereira and Anothe ...
Mumbai
Oct-31-1996
Property
Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkar's (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 4 and 29(4); Mundkar Protection Act, 1976; Goa, Daman and Diu (Protection of Mundkars, Agricultural Labourers and Village Artisans) Act, 1971
1997(3)ALLMR328; 1998(2)BomCR324
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The respondent No. 1 had filed an application for registration as mundkar under section 29(4) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Agnelo Barreto and Mrs. Zalia Barreto Vs. Mr. Xavier Fernandes,
Mumbai
Oct-28-2005
PropertyCivil
(2006)108BOMLR113
S.S. Kantak and ;R. Chodankar, Advs.
N.A. Britto, J.1.The defendant nos.1 and 2 in Special Civil Suit No.250/91/B have filed this Second Appeal which was admitted by the Order of this Court dated 2762003 on a substantial question of law, which reads...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhaskar Pandurang Prabhu Desai and Others Vs. Gajanan Arjun Salgaonkar ...
Mumbai
Sep-06-1996
Tenancy Property
Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 7 of 1964 - Sections 7, 7A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 5 of 1908 - Sections 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 58(2) and 85A
AIR1997Bom177
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
1. The appellants (plaintiffs in the Suit) had filed a Suit for recovery of possession and permanent injunction seeking to restrain the respondents (defendants in the Suit) from interfering with the suit property 'Chambhar Bhatlem and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKum. Maria Eliza Marques Vs. Shri Madhukar M. Moraskar and Others
Mumbai
Nov-19-1997
Property
Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 8-A, 15, 16, 25 and 41; Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution of India - 13, 14, 19(1) 31-A and B and 300-A; Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 34 and 115
1998(2)ALLMR703; 1998(3)BomCR36
S.S. Usgaonkar, ;S.S. Kantak, ;E.P. Lobo, Advs.
ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The group of eight writ petitions was taken up together for hearing and is disposed of by this common judgment since in all the writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDasharath Narahari Narvekar Vs. Syndicate Bank
Mumbai
Feb-24-1989
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 31A and 31A(5A)
[1989]66CompCas45(Bom)
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
Dr. G.F. Couto, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated October 30, 1986, whereby the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa, dismissed the suit for damages filed by the appellant.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCedric X. Pinheiro Vs. Smt. Josefina Remedios and Another
Mumbai
Jan-22-1997
Company
[1998]91CompCas99(Bom)
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
R.K. Batta, J.1. The entire dispute in this appeal centres round fixed deposit receipt No. 208 of 1975, for Rs. 20,000, which was subsequently renewed as Fixed Deposit Receipt No. 244 of 1986, and a sum...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Felix Menino Jesus Serrao Vs. State of Goa and Others
Mumbai
Mar-02-2000
Property
Goa, Daman and Diu Village Panchayat (Regulation of Buildings) Rules, 1985 - Rule 3
2000(3)BomCR507
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 76/95 seeks directions to respondent No. 3 to act in pursuance of notices dated 24th February, 1994 and 16th February, 1995 to demolish the compound wall and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Naseema Shaikh Vs. Shri JainuddIn M. Shaikh
Mumbai
May-22-1998
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 115; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 12 and 17
1998(4)ALLMR580; 1998(4)BomCR225
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Admit. Heard forthwith by consent.2. This is a revision application against the Order dated 14th May, 1998 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 55/96/B by the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division at Vasco-da-Gama....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Savita Bandodkar and Others Vs. Shri Edmundo Rodrigues and Others
Mumbai
Jan-12-1998
Property
Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 32 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Agricultural Tenancy Act; Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964
1998(4)ALLMR236; 1998(5)BomCR838
S.S. Kantak, Adv.
ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. By the present petition the petitioners challenge the orders passed by the respondents 4 and 5 rejecting the claim of the petitioners formundkarship in respect of house No. 932 situated at Benaulim Accona,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »