Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s s kantak · Page 1 of about 69 results (0.054 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 16 1992

Gurudas Balkrishna Vs. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panaji-goa

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-16-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR27; (1993)95BOMLR60; 1994CriLJ444; 1993(2)MhLj1082

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak (as Amicus Curiae), Adv.

ORDER1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent. 2. Applicant in person has filed this application praying for transfer of a criminal case which he has filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Panaji and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1996

Smt. Esmeralda Rosario and Others Vs. Shri Cornelio Pereira and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkar's (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 4 and 29(4); Mundkar Protection Act, 1976; Goa, Daman and Diu (Protection of Mundkars, Agricultural Labourers and Village Artisans) Act, 1971

Reported in : 1997(3)ALLMR328; 1998(2)BomCR324

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The respondent No. 1 had filed an application for registration as mundkar under section 29(4) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 (hereinafter called 'the said Act'). The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2005

Mr. Agnelo Barreto and Mrs. Zalia Barreto Vs. Mr. Xavier Fernandes,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (2006)108BOMLR113

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak and ;R. Chodankar, Advs.

N.A. Britto, J.1.The defendant nos.1 and 2 in Special Civil Suit No.250/91/B have filed this Second Appeal which was admitted by the Order of this Court dated 2762003 on a substantial question of law, which reads...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 1996

Bhaskar Pandurang Prabhu Desai and Others Vs. Gajanan Arjun Salgaonkar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-06-1996

Subject : Tenancy Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 7 of 1964 - Sections 7, 7A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 5 of 1908 - Sections 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 58(2) and 85A

Reported in : AIR1997Bom177

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

1. The appellants (plaintiffs in the Suit) had filed a Suit for recovery of possession and permanent injunction seeking to restrain the respondents (defendants in the Suit) from interfering with the suit property 'Chambhar Bhatlem and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1997

Kum. Maria Eliza Marques Vs. Shri Madhukar M. Moraskar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-19-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 8-A, 15, 16, 25 and 41; Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution of India - 13, 14, 19(1) 31-A and B and 300-A; Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 - Sections 17; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 34 and 115

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR703; 1998(3)BomCR36

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Usgaonkar, ;S.S. Kantak, ;E.P. Lobo, Advs.

ORDERR.M. Lodha, J.1. The group of eight writ petitions was taken up together for hearing and is disposed of by this common judgment since in all the writ petitions the petitioners have challenged the constitutionality of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1989

Dasharath Narahari Narvekar Vs. Syndicate Bank

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-1989

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 31A and 31A(5A)

Reported in : [1989]66CompCas45(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

Dr. G.F. Couto, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated October 30, 1986, whereby the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Mapusa, dismissed the suit for damages filed by the appellant.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1997

Cedric X. Pinheiro Vs. Smt. Josefina Remedios and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-22-1997

Subject : Company

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas99(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

R.K. Batta, J.1. The entire dispute in this appeal centres round fixed deposit receipt No. 208 of 1975, for Rs. 20,000, which was subsequently renewed as Fixed Deposit Receipt No. 244 of 1986, and a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2000

Shri Felix Menino Jesus Serrao Vs. State of Goa and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Village Panchayat (Regulation of Buildings) Rules, 1985 - Rule 3

Reported in : 2000(3)BomCR507

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 76/95 seeks directions to respondent No. 3 to act in pursuance of notices dated 24th February, 1994 and 16th February, 1995 to demolish the compound wall and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 1998

Smt. Naseema Shaikh Vs. Shri JainuddIn M. Shaikh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-22-1998

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11 and 115; Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 12 and 17

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR580; 1998(4)BomCR225

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Admit. Heard forthwith by consent.2. This is a revision application against the Order dated 14th May, 1998 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 55/96/B by the Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division at Vasco-da-Gama....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 1998

Smt. Savita Bandodkar and Others Vs. Shri Edmundo Rodrigues and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-12-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 - Sections 32 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 3; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Agricultural Tenancy Act; Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR236; 1998(5)BomCR838

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Kantak, Adv.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. By the present petition the petitioners challenge the orders passed by the respondents 4 and 5 rejecting the claim of the petitioners formundkarship in respect of house No. 932 situated at Benaulim Accona,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial