Advanced Search Results

Devi Parshad Mathur Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1956 - Rule 19(1)

Reported in : 8(1972)DLT112

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Gupta,; R.L. Aggarwal and; S.P. Aggarwal, Advs

Jagjit Singh, J.(1) On April 30, 1955 Shri C. L. Chadha, Senior Accounts Officer. Foreign Traffic Accounts, Western Railway, Kishan Ganj, Delhi, imposed the penalty of withholding of increments for two years with cumulative effect on...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad Vs. Shri Jagdish Jakhotia and A ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Manish Mohan SDR for Appellant. Shri A.M. Chitnis Consultant for Respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Gupta C.A. for Respondent No. 2

Per: Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Appeal No. E/1189/09 is against Shri Jagdish Jakhotia and Appeal No. E/1190/08 is against M/s Shree Durga Iron and Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. and it’s Director Shri Pawan Kumar Agawarl...

Raj Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ3205

Sham Sunder, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 12-6-1997, rendered by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Sonepat, vide which it convicted the accused/appellant Raj Singh,...

Electronic and Engineering Co. Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1997)(92)ELT382TriDel

1. The appellants imported Nickel Cadmium Battery Cells describing them in the Bill of Entry as Cathode Ray Tube and Sockets being components used for ultrasonic flow detectors. The goods were cleared on payment of duty...

Searle (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(66)ECC188

1. These are the applications filed by waiver of pre-deposit totally amount of Rs. 5,23,29,30//-. There is equal amount of penalty levied on the director, the penalty of the stay of recovery of the same.2. Question...

S S Gupta vs.the Delhi Power Co Ltd & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA382016 S S GUPTA Date of Judgment:19. h July, 2018 Through: Ms.Pratima Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI POWER CO LTD &...

Raptakos, Brett and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)(99)ELT176TriDel

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.S. Gupta

1. The appeal arose on account of the decisions of the lower authorities denying certain deductions claimed by the appellant who is engaged in the manufacture of P & P medicines. Deductions disallowed are interest on...

M.M. Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(141)ELT428Tri(Kol.)kata

1. The challenge in the present appeal is the imposition of personal penalty of Rs. 20,00,000/- (rupees twenty lakhs) imposed on the appellant under the provisions of Sections 112(a) & (b) of the Customs Act, 1962....

Shri Vijay Tailor and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(80)ECC230

1. As in these 5 appeals the issues are inter-related all of them are being taken up for disposal together.2. Shri S.S. Gupta, learned advocate, submitted that Kisan Extrusion Ltd. manufacture PVC pipes and fittings; that...

Essel Propack Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2004)(167)ELT547Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The above appeals arise out of three separate adjudication orders of the Commissioner of Central Excise on identical issues in respect of three units of M/s. Essel Propack Limited and their Officers. Appeal No. E/1005/2003...