Advanced Search Results
Devi Parshad Mathur Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Nov-19-1970
Service
Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1956 - Rule 19(1)
8(1972)DLT112
S.S. Gupta,; R.L. Aggarwal and; S.P. Aggarwal, Advs
Jagjit Singh, J.(1) On April 30, 1955 Shri C. L. Chadha, Senior Accounts Officer. Foreign Traffic Accounts, Western Railway, Kishan Ganj, Delhi, imposed the penalty of withholding of increments for two years with cumulative effect on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaptakos, Brett and Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-21-1998
MRTP
(1998)(99)ELT176TriDel
Shri. S.S. Gupta
1. The appeal arose on account of the decisions of the lower authorities denying certain deductions claimed by the appellant who is engaged in the manufacture of P & P medicines. Deductions disallowed are interest on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Raigad Vs. Shri Jagdish Jakhotia and A ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-10-2010
Service Tax
Shri Manish Mohan SDR for Appellant. Shri A.M. Chitnis Consultant for Respondent No. 1. Shri S.S. Gupta C.A. for Respondent No. 2
Per: Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) Appeal No. E/1189/09 is against Shri Jagdish Jakhotia and Appeal No. E/1190/08 is against M/s Shree Durga Iron and Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. and it’s Director Shri Pawan Kumar Agawarl...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Pharma Medico India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-19-2004
Land Acquisition
Shri. S.S. Gupta
1. As per facts on record appellants are engaged in the manufacture of P & P Medicaments on loan license basis for M/s. Satyam Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. The dispute in the present appeal relates to deduction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Parameshwara. K vs the South Indian Bank Ltd.,
Karnataka
Jun-08-2026
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 13279 OF 2026 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:1. MR. PARAMESHWARA K., S/O. LATE KRISHNAPPA,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaj Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-26-2008
Criminal
2008CriLJ3205
Sham Sunder, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 12-6-1997, rendered by the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge, Sonepat, vide which it convicted the accused/appellant Raj Singh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskElectronic and Engineering Co. Vs. Commissioner of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-03-1997
Service Tax
(1997)(92)ELT382TriDel
1. The appellants imported Nickel Cadmium Battery Cells describing them in the Bill of Entry as Cathode Ray Tube and Sockets being components used for ultrasonic flow detectors. The goods were cleared on payment of duty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSearle (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-12-1999
Service Tax
(1999)(66)ECC188
1. These are the applications filed by waiver of pre-deposit totally amount of Rs. 5,23,29,30//-. There is equal amount of penalty levied on the director, the penalty of the stay of recovery of the same.2. Question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M. Exports Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jan-22-2002
Service Tax
(2002)(141)ELT428Tri(Kol.)kata
1. The challenge in the present appeal is the imposition of personal penalty of Rs. 20,00,000/- (rupees twenty lakhs) imposed on the appellant under the provisions of Sections 112(a) & (b) of the Customs Act, 1962....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAristo Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-27-2003
MRTP
(2003)(154)ELT413TriDel
1. The issue raised in both these appeals is the same, the effect of amendment in Section 4 (Valuation) of Central Excise Act, 1944 in the valuation of medicines which are subject to Maximum Retail Price,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »