Advanced Search Results

AmeeruddIn and Four ors. Vs. Premakumari

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 14(1) and 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC340

Advocate for Appellant : K. Sampath, Sr. Counsel and ;S. Rajasekaran, Adv.

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Both the revisions arise out of a common order passed by the Appellate Authority ordering eviction on the ground of demolition and reconstruction. The petitioners are the tenants. The respondent filed Rcop Nos....

Tmt. T. Indra and G. Panneerselvam Vs. the Member Secretary, Chennai M ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)CTC125; (2004)4MLJ242

Advocate for Appellant : V. Chandrakanthan and ;D.S. Rajasekaran, Advs.

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J. 1. By a resolution dated 6.7.1999, the respondent authority prescribed the age, qualification and method of recruitment for the post of Law Officer Grade II, which reads as follows,Name of the Method of...

Dr. S.H. Sithik Basha Vs. Fazal Ahmed

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 499 and 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 200, 207, 255(1) and 257

Reported in : AIR2007Mad78; 2006(5)CTC609; (2007)1MLJ320

Advocate for Appellant : S. Rajasekaran, Adv.

A.C. Arumugaperumal Adityan, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the Judgment in C.C. No. 177 of 1997 on the file of Judicial Magistrate No. II, Chengleput. The complainant is the appellant herein.2. The short facts...

Nathiya Faru Vs. Rojan Roux

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act - Sections 13; Family Courts Rules; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 132 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ945

Advocate for Appellant : D. Geetha, Adv.

ORDERS. Palanivelu, J.1. The petitioner is mother of one Roux Pauline who is wife of the respondent. Both of them have got three children. Their marriage was solemnized on 24.04.2000. After the marriage, both the spouses...

A.Sunil Kothari Vs. Chairman of Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 11.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.27845 of 2013 A.Sunil Kothari ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, No.800, Anna Salai,...

Geranco Aromatics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Vadapalani Ass ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1989]74STC240(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T.K. Ramkumar, Adv.

ORDERSivasubramaniam, J. 1. Mr. M. S. Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Taxes), takes notice for the respondent. 2. The writ petition is for the following relief : '...... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate...

Govindasamy Balasubramaniam Vs The Authorised Officer

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED1. Govindasamy Balasubramaniam2. Jeevarathinam .. Petitioners in both CRPs Vs.1. The Authorised Officer Indian Overseas Bank,...

M.Kumar and ors. Vs. the Corporation of Chennai and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.D.S.Rajasekaran, Adv

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to receive and process petitioners' application for planning permission at Block No.31, Ex-servicemen...

Gnanagunaseeli Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 203, 302, 303 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164 and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 118

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2849; 1995(2)CTC610

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv. for ;M/s. Rajasekaran and ;S. Paneerselvam, Adv.

Janarthanam, J.1. The appellant Gnanagunaseeli was accused in S.C. No. 118/86 on the file of the Court of Session, South Arcot Division, Cuddalore. She was found guilty under Ss. 302 and 203, I.P.C., convicted thereunder and...

Jaycee Engg. Services Vs. Cegat

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 35F

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC469

Advocate for Appellant : S. Rajasekaran, Adv.

ORDERY. Venkatachalam, J. 1. Invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein has filed the present writ petition seeking for a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to Order No....