Advanced Search Results

Ku. Archana Dadarao Pethkar and Others Vs. Joint Commissioner and Vice ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.R. Narnaware

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. By these petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of termination passed by their respective Employer as a consequence of invalidation...

Rajendra S/O Ramaji Mahisbadwe Vs. the Joint Commissioner and Vice Cha ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.R. Narnaware

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order of termination dated 03.11.2009, passed by Respondent no.2 – Additional General Manager/Engineering...

Deepak Vs. Dy. Director (R) and Member-Secretary, Scheduled Tribe Cast ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. S.R. Narnaware

Oral Judgment: (B.R. Gavai, J.) 1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties finally by consent. 2. The petitioner has approached this Court mainly praying for the following reliefs: i. âprotect the services...

Arun Vs. State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Edu ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

R.K. Deshpande, J. 1. All these matters are placed before this Full Bench by a common order of reference dated 1-10-2013 passed by the Division Bench of this Court (Smt. Vasanti A. Naik and Shri A.S....

Alka and Others Vs. Joint Director and Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.S. Parsodkar

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. In all these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to order of the Scrutiny Committee functioning under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic...

Alka and Others Vs. Joint Director and Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.S. Parsodkar

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. In all these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to order of the Scrutiny Committee functioning under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic...

Prashant S/O Haribhau Khawas Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 10; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act; Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 342

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR572; 2008(6)BomCR190; 2008(2)MhLj322

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Narnaware, Adv.

R.V. More, J.1. Rule in all the petitions. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Since, common question of law arises in all these petitions, they are being disposed of by common judgment.2. All...

Avinash Tulshiram Limje Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Sections 3, 6, 6(1) and 8; Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 - Rules 9, 11 and 12

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR9; 2007(4)BomCR270; 2007(4)MhLj305

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Narnaware, Adv.

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and is heard, as the petitions can be decided on the basis of contents of the petitions and annexures thereto, and returns filed on record.2. The petitioners...

Sanjay Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR986]

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Narnaware, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.The petitioner was appointed on 31.8.2000 as teacher in the Primary School managed by respondent No. 1 Zilla Parishad. The petitioner was appointed on the...