Advanced Search Results

In the matter of various Companies (in Liquidation) and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

1. The Official Liquidator has filed a report dated 18th February, 2013 praying for sanction to terminate with immediate effect the services of Shri S.M. Shetty, company paid Group 'D' Peon. According to the Official Liquidator...

In Re: Mayfair Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 101(2) and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2004(2)BomCR235; [2004]122CompCas748(Bom); (2003)4CompLJ102(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj663; [2003]46SCL672(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.C. Master, Adv. for ;Regional Director, ;S.R. Kom, Adv. for ;Official Liquidator and ;J. Mitra and ;Delilah Fernandes, Advs. for ;Subhash Knitting Industries;Virag V. Tulzapurkar and ;Alpana Ghone,

D.G. Karnik, J.1. Company Petition No. 326 of 2003 is filed by transferor-company while Company Petition No. 327 of 2003 is filed by the transferee-company. The transferor and transferee-companies have sought approval and sanction from this...

Kaveri Entertainment Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1) and 391(2)

Reported in : 2003(5)BomCR576; [2003]117CompCas245(Bom); (2004)3CompLJ365(Bom); [2003]45SCL294(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.A. Dube, Adv. and ;Sureshkumar, Panel Counsel, i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik for ;Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs and ;S.R. Kom, Official Liquidator Present;J.J. Bhatt and ;V.C. Khatri, Advs

D.G. Karnik, J.Heard.1. This petition is filed by Kaveri Entertainment Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') for approval of the Scheme of Arrangement (for short 'the scheme') by which the company proposes to amalgamate and...

In Re: Bhilosa Synthetics (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 394

Reported in : [2004]53SCL400(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Shah, Adv.;S.R. Kom, Adv.

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The Petitioner Company, Bhilosa Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. (for short 'Petitioner-Company' or the 'Transferor-Company' or 'BSPL'). In fact the provisions of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for obtaining sanction...

Alstom Power Boilers Ltd. Vs. State Bank of India and anr. and Mrs. Da ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR202; [2002]112CompCas674(Bom); (2003)2CompLJ210(Bom); [2003]42SCL197(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : C.J. Joy and ;D.A. Dube, Advs., i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik for Regional Director, Department of Company Affairs;S.R. Kom, official liquidator;Rishabh Shah, Adv., i/b., ;Prem Ranga, Adv. for Employees Union i

R.J. Kochar, J. 1. The petitioners, the transferor companies, have prayed for sanction of the scheme of arrangement for amalgamation of the petitioners with the transferee company, the APIL, under Sections 391 to 394 of the...

In Re: Sanvijay Alloys (P.) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 392, 393 and 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR481; [2004]122CompCas754(Bom); [2004]54SCL213(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.H. Parikh and ;Ramesh Saraogi, Advs.;S.R. Kom, Adv.

ORDERAnoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present Company Petition has been filed in the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of Sanvijay Alloys Pvt. Ltd. and Sanvijay Industries Pvt. Ltd., Sanvijay Steels Pvt. Ltd., with Sanvijay Rolling Engineering...

In Re: Morarjee Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 78, 100 to 104, 235 to 251 and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR836; (2004)3CompLJ380(Bom); [2004]55SCL680(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv. and ;S.A. Divan, Adv., i/b., Crawford Bayley and Co.;S.R. Kom, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The present company petition has been filed by the company known as the Morarjee Goculdas Spinning and Weaving Mills Company Ltd., a company deemed to be incorporated under the Companies Act and...

In Re: Scheme of Amalgamation of Indusind Enterprises and Finance Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 391(2); Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 44A; Company (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 78

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR606; I(2004)BC615; [2004]120CompCas457(Bom); (2003)4CompLJ80(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj835; [2004]50SCL68(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Kom, Official Liquidator (In Com. Petition No. 1085/2002) and ;Ramchandra Jethanand Uttamchandani, Intervening Shareholder Present in person;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, ;S. Srikrishnan and ;Suman Kaman

D.G. Karnik, J.1. IndusInd Enterprises and Finance Limited (for short, the 'transferor company'), the petitioner in Company Petition No. 1085 of 2002, has filed this petition for sanction of the scheme of arrangement under which the...

In Re: Amalgamation of Shaily Engineering Plastics Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 97 and 391 to 394

Reported in : 2003(1)ALLMR668; 2003(2)BomCR514; 2003(2)MhLj22

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Kom, Official Liquidator;A. Chandurkar, Adv., i/b., ;A.S. Dayal and Associates;C.J. Joy, Adv. and ;D.A. Dubey, Panel Counsel, i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik, Adv.

1. The petitioner company, being transferee company, Anmol Trading Company Ltd., seeks sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 with the transferor companies. The amalgamation is intended...

indusind Enterprises and Finance Ltd. Vs. Indusind Bank Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 394; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 44A; Company Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 78

Reported in : 2003(4)BomCR482

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Kom, Official Liquidator in Com. Petition No. 1085/2002 and ;Ramchandra Jethanand Uttamchandani Intervening Shareholder in Person in both Petitions;Virag V. Tulzapurkar, ;S. Srikrishnan and ;Su

Karnik D.G., J.1. IndusInd Enterprises and Finance Limited (for short, the 'transferor company'), the petitioner in Company Petition No. 1085 of 2002, has filed this petition for sanction of the scheme of arrangement under which the...