Advanced Search Results
Shri Vinod Vithal Rane Vs. Shri R.H. Mendonca and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-25-2001
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1), 5-A and 55; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 55, 57, 107, 109, 110, 149 and 151; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 226; Maharashtra Prevention of Communal, Anti-Social and Other Dangerous Activites Act, 1980; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Amendment Act, 1996; Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 425; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 2; Arms Act, 1959; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930
2001BomCR(Cri)537; (2001)2BOMLR307; 2001(2)MhLj437
Shri U.N. Tripathi, Adv.;Shri S.R. Chitnis Amicus Curiae
A. M. Khanwilkar, J.1. All these five writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seek to challenge the respective detention orders passed by Shri R. H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police, Birhan Mumbai, in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Zebunnisa Abdul Majid Vs. Shri M.N. Singh, Commissioner of Police ...
Mumbai
Apr-04-2001
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 384, 387, 504 and 506; Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985
(2001)3BOMLR41; 2001CriLJ2759; 2001(3)MhLj365
Mr. S.R. Chitnis, Senior Counsel and ;Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv., i/b ;Mr. S.V. Kotwal
Smt. Ranjana Desai, J.1. This petition is filed by the mother of one Abdul Rafiq alias Rafiq Lala Majid Shaikh ('the detenu') who has been detained under the provisions of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Harun Habibullah Shaikh Vs. Shri R. H. Mendonca, Commissioner of ...
Mumbai
Oct-16-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 141, 147, 341, 353 and 506
1997BomCR(Cri)357; 1997CriLJ2085; 1997(3)MhLj104
Mr. S.R. Chitnis, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. By this petition, preferred under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the detention order dated 25-3-1996 passed by the respondent No. 1, by virtue of the powers...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt Kailas Laxman Joshi Vs. B. Akashi Commissioner of Police, Thane an ...
Mumbai
Jun-16-1994
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 38, 383 and 384
1994(4)BomCR147; 1995CriLJ231
S.R. Chitnis, Adv.
Rane, J.1. The petitioner in this petition has challenged the detention order dated 8-2-1994 issued and served by the 1st respondent, Commissioner of Police, Thane in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (2) of Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKashinath @ Kashya Tukaram Lad Vs. R.D. Tyagi, Commissioner of Police ...
Mumbai
Oct-10-1996
Criminal
National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(1); Constitution of India - Article 22(5)
1997BomCR(Cri)768
S.R. Chitnis
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By means of this petition referred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/detenu has impugned the detention order dated 19th January 1996 passed by respondent No. 1 by virtue of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArif HussaIn Sabir HussaIn @ Pann Wala Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jun-26-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Terrorism Act - Sections 32(1) and 49
2007CriLJ135; 2006(5)MhLj241
S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Adv. and ;Sharif Shaikh, Adv.
J.N. Patel, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the original accused No. 11 who is facing trial in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the Special Judge under POTA impugning the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhangi Tukaram Sawant Vs. R.H. Mendonca and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-21-2000
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3 and 12(2); Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29; Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Women and Girls Act, 1956; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 300 and 324; Prohibition Act; Constitution of India - Article 14; Official Secrets Act - Sections 3; Preventive Detention Act - Sections 8; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 110
2001ALLMR(Cri)1819; 2001BomCR(Cri)152; (2001)4BOMLR631; 2001CriLJ3745; 2001(3)MhLj580
S.R. Chitnis, Senior Adv.
S. Radhakrishnan, J. 1. In both the above writ petitions, detention orders passed by the first Respondent - Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under the provisions of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords. Bootleggers, Drug...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Nasir Maqbul Shaikh Age 36 Years, Vs. Commissioner of Police, Sol ...
Mumbai
Aug-03-2010
Education
Constitution of India - Article 22(5), ; Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Mr. S. R. Chitnis, Sr.; Mr. U. N. Tripathi, Advs.
1) The petitioner, who is a brother of detenu Salim Maqbul Shaikh (Salim Shethji), by this petition has challenged the Order of detention of six months dated 13.03.2010, passed by the Office of the Commissioner of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHalya Wajya Kurmuda Vs. R.D. Tyagi, Commr. of Police, Thane and Others
Mumbai
Dec-20-1990
Criminal
1991(2)BomCR331; (1991)93BOMLR83; 1991CriLJ1240
S.R. Chitnis, Adv.
S.W. Puranik, J.1. The petitioner impugns the order of detention dated 19th June 1990 passed by the 1st respondent against him under the National Security Act. Even though the petitioner-detenu raises many grounds to challenge the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHeeralal Ramlal Parmar and Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jul-16-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 307 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 374(4)
1998CriLJ574
R.S. Chitnis and ;M. S. Mohite, Advs. for ;S.R. Chitnis
1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts, and a common impugned judgment, I am disposing them off together. 2. Vide judgment and order dated 30-7-1990, passed by the Assistant Sessions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »