Advanced Search Results
John Ohuma Ogmekwe and Another Vs. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Contr ...
Mumbai
Apr-01-1998
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 23, 29, 30, 14, 42, 50, 53 and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 17, 25, 26, 27, 59, 61 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31
1998BomCR(Cri)842
G.G. Lalla and ;Anil G. Lalla, Advs., instructed by; Lalla & Lalla, ;S.R. Borulkar, Amicus Curie
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 18th October 1994 passed by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in N.D.P.S. Special Case No. 727 of 1990, whereby they have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Bhanudas Sommanna Sangolkar
Mumbai
Feb-24-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 164 and 313
1997BomCR(Cri)678; 1997CriLJ3205
S.R. Borulkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor; Shirish Gupte, Adv.
Sahai, J.1. The Appellant, aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 26th August, 1983 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Sessions case No. 16 of 1983, acquitting the Respondent for an offence punishable under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Vinayak Tukaram Utekar and Another
Mumbai
Jan-30-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324, 360, 379, 390, 391, 394, 395 and 397
1997(2)MhLj527
S.R. Borulkar, APP
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts and a common impugned judgment we propose disposing them of together. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 473 of 1984, has been preferred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State of Maharashtra Vs. M/S. Simplex Woollen Mills and Others
Mumbai
Feb-07-1997
Criminal
1997CriLJ2079
S.R. Borulkar, A.P.P.
1. All these five appeals are filed by the State for enhancement of sentence awarded to the respondents-accused by the Vth Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane under the provisions of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Mesu Dhondiba Vidhate
Mumbai
Jul-24-1998
CriminalFamily
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
I(1999)DMC724
S.R. Borulkar, A.P.P.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal, the State of Maharashtra (Appellant) challenges the judgment and order dated 30.11.1984, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 129 of 1984, acquitting the respondent for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArif HussaIn Sabir HussaIn @ Pann Wala Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jun-26-2006
Criminal
Prevention of Terrorism Act - Sections 32(1) and 49
2007CriLJ135; 2006(5)MhLj241
S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Adv. and ;Sharif Shaikh, Adv.
J.N. Patel, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the original accused No. 11 who is facing trial in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the Special Judge under POTA impugning the order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajiv Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Oct-28-2005
Criminal
Companies Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 14 and 17(4); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 43A and 62; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272, 273 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 43(8), 272, 273 and 420; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006CriLJ581; 2006FAJ135
N.K. Thakore and ;Prakash Naik, Advs.
Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioners are the directors of a company called 'Dharampal Satyapal Limited' (for short, 'the said Company') incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, having its main office at Delhi and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Shivaji Trimukhe Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-26-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307
1996(4)BomCR374; (1996)98BOMLR174; 1997CriLJ178; 1996(2)MhLj477
Deepak More, Adv.
Sahai J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 21-2-1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 295 of 1993, convicting and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDadu Maruti Gaikwad Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-20-1997
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 215 and 235
1997BomCR(Cri)903
Shirley Mazerollo, Adv. for ;R.S. Mohite, Adv.
Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 30-12-1983 passed by II Extra Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 33 of 1983, convicting and sentencing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaysing @ Gangawa Mesraj Kharariya and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...
Mumbai
Dec-09-1998
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 165; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25
1999(5)BomCR322; 1999CriLJ1687
R.S. More, ;D.R. More and ;P.K. Dhakephalkar, Advs.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned Judgment, we are disposing them off by one Judgment.Through these appeals, the appellants challenge the Judgement and Order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »