Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s r borulkar · Page 1 of about 50 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 01 1998

John Ohuma Ogmekwe and Another Vs. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Contr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-01-1998

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 23, 29, 30, 14, 42, 50, 53 and 67; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 17, 25, 26, 27, 59, 61 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 31

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)842

Advocate for Appellant : G.G. Lalla and ;Anil G. Lalla, Advs., instructed by; Lalla & Lalla, ;S.R. Borulkar, Amicus Curie

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal the appellants have challenged the judgment and order dated 18th October 1994 passed by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay, in N.D.P.S. Special Case No. 727 of 1990, whereby they have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1997

State of Maharashtra Vs. Bhanudas Sommanna Sangolkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 164 and 313

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)678; 1997CriLJ3205

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, Addl. Public Prosecutor; Shirish Gupte, Adv.

Sahai, J.1. The Appellant, aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 26th August, 1983 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, in Sessions case No. 16 of 1983, acquitting the Respondent for an offence punishable under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1997

State of Maharashtra Vs. Vinayak Tukaram Utekar and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-30-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324, 360, 379, 390, 391, 394, 395 and 397

Reported in : 1997(2)MhLj527

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, APP

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of the same set of facts and a common impugned judgment we propose disposing them of together. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 473 of 1984, has been preferred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 1997

The State of Maharashtra Vs. M/S. Simplex Woollen Mills and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-07-1997

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2079

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, A.P.P.

1. All these five appeals are filed by the State for enhancement of sentence awarded to the respondents-accused by the Vth Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane under the provisions of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 1998

State of Maharashtra Vs. Mesu Dhondiba Vidhate

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-24-1998

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : I(1999)DMC724

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Borulkar, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this appeal, the State of Maharashtra (Appellant) challenges the judgment and order dated 30.11.1984, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No. 129 of 1984, acquitting the respondent for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 2006

Arif HussaIn Sabir HussaIn @ Pann Wala Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-26-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act - Sections 32(1) and 49

Reported in : 2007CriLJ135; 2006(5)MhLj241

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Adv. and ;Sharif Shaikh, Adv.

J.N. Patel, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the original accused No. 11 who is facing trial in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003 before the Special Judge under POTA impugning the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2005

Rajiv Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 14 and 17(4); Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rules 43A and 62; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 272, 273 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 43(8), 272, 273 and 420; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006CriLJ581; 2006FAJ135

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Thakore and ;Prakash Naik, Advs.

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. The petitioners are the directors of a company called 'Dharampal Satyapal Limited' (for short, 'the said Company') incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, having its main office at Delhi and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1996

Manoj Shivaji Trimukhe Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-26-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307

Reported in : 1996(4)BomCR374; (1996)98BOMLR174; 1997CriLJ178; 1996(2)MhLj477

Advocate for Appellant : Deepak More, Adv.

Sahai J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 21-2-1994 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 295 of 1993, convicting and sentencing him to undergo life imprisonment and a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1997

Dadu Maruti Gaikwad Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299, 302 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 32, 45, 59 and 61; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 215 and 235

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)903

Advocate for Appellant : Shirley Mazerollo, Adv. for ;R.S. Mohite, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By means of this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 30-12-1983 passed by II Extra Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. 33 of 1983, convicting and sentencing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1998

Jaysing @ Gangawa Mesraj Kharariya and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-09-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149 and 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 165; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR322; 1999CriLJ1687

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. More, ;D.R. More and ;P.K. Dhakephalkar, Advs.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Since both these appeals arise out of same set of facts and a common impugned Judgment, we are disposing them off by one Judgment.Through these appeals, the appellants challenge the Judgement and Order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial