Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s r ashok · Page 1 of about 469 results (0.235 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 16 2004

Raasi Cement Ltd. Vs. Cit (No. 3)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-16-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]156TAXMAN74(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Mohan & Janardhan Raju, for the Petitioner S.R. Ashok, for the Respondent.

M.H.S. Ansari, J.The petitioner-assessee has questioned the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad, passed under section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), rejecting the waiver petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 06 2002

Cit Vs. Transport Corpn. India Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-06-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]123TAXMAN806(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue Y. Ratnakar, for the Assessee

S.R. Nayak, J. In these referred cases, the Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', has referred the following questions of law to this court under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2001

Y.S.C. Babu Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Syndicate Bank

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-04-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]120TAXMAN88(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Gani Reddy, for the Assessee A. Krishnam Raju and S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue

ORDERNayak, J.The petitioner in W.P. No. 14201 of 2001 and the petitioner in W.P. No. 14218 of 2001 worked as Deputy Chief Officer (Inspection) and Manager (Audit), respectively, in the establishment of the Syndicate Bank and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sri Krishna Oil Complex Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-27-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]107TAXMAN100(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue q S. Ravi, for the Assessee

Maruthi, J.The following questions are referred by the Tribunal under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') at the instance of the revenue for the opinion of this Court:'1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2000

R.B. Mittal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-04-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(AP)366; [2001]112TAXMAN480(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : Y. Ratnakar and A. Satyanarayana, for the Assessee S. R. Ashok, for the Revenue

Nayak, J.This petition is filed under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Income Tax Act against the decision of the Tribunal, Hyderabad A-Bench in R.A. No. 36 (Hyd.) of 1993, dated 30-4-1993. The petitioner,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 14 2003

Cit Vs. Coromandal Fertilizers Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-14-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]128TAXMAN869(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue P.S. Pardiwalla, for the Assessee

ORDERB. Sudershan Reddy, J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, at the instance of the revenue, referred the following question of law to this court for its opinion :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 2001

Trustees of HEH, the Nizarn's Supplementary Jewellery Trust Vs. CWT

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-20-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]122TAXMAN249(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Murali Krishna, for the Assessee S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue

ORDERS.R. Nayak, J.The Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', has referred the following question for the opinion of the High Court under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) :'Whether, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2003

Cit Vs. Smt. T. Suryamani Kothavalasa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-24-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]130TAXMAN538(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Ashok, for the Applicant

S. Ananda Reddy, J.At the instance of the revenue, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad A Bench, Hyderabad, (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) referred the following questions, said to arise out of its order in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2001

Sms Schloemann Siemag, A.G. Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]250ITR97(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ramachandran for B. Ravindra, for the Assessee S.R. Ashok, for the Revenue

S.B. Sinha, C.J.Reference to this Bench has been made by a Division Bench of this court having regard to the importance of theuestion as regards the interpretation of section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2001

Ummul Qura Educational Society and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Prade ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-26-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Minority Educational Institutions (Establishment, Recognition and Regulation) Rules, 1988 - Rules 2, 2(2), 3, 4, 6, 6(4), 7(2) and 7(5); Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prevention of Capitation Fees) Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 19, 25 to 30, 30(1) and 226; Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Sections 20, 20-A, 99 and 102; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana area) Societies Registration Act, 1350 Fasli

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD250; 2001(5)ALT422

Advocate for Appellant : E. Manohar, Sr. Counsel for N. Shoba, ;S.R. Ashok, Sr. Counsel for S. Srinivasa Reddy, ;Nooty Ramamohana Rao for Duggineni Vijaya, ;A. Ramanarayana, ;S. Niranjan Reddy and ;S. Sriram, Advs.

ORDER1. This batch of writ petitions may have to be disposed of by a common order since common questions of law arise for consideration and the subject matter involved requiring adjudication is the same. 2. All...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial