Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s prabakar · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.019 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2012

Y.Koteeswariah and anr. Vs. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewe ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 81(2)(C), 81; Constitution Of India - Article 226; Employees Services Regulation Act, 1978; Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Regulations, 1982 - Regulations 6, 21(a), 21A

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Nalini Chidambaram; Ms.C.Uma, Advs.

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 2nd Respondent having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 2026

Karthikeyan Vs The State Rep by. The Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-24-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Karthikeyan S/o.Ramasamy, No. 9/69, Agiladapuram, Kangeyam,2. K.Tamilselvi C / o. Karthikeyan, No. 9/69, Agiladapurarn, Kangeyam, ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by. The Inspector of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2010

G.Anandakumar, and anr. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.S.Prabakar, Adv.

1. Since the issue involved in both the writ petitions raise a common point and the facts are interconnected with the consent of both parties, they are disposed of by this common order.2. Both the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 18 1996

Pandi and Another Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-18-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 380, 392 and 459; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 164(4), 281 and 313; Evidence Act - Sections 114 and 114A

Reported in : 1997CriLJ2964

Advocate for Appellant : S. Prabakar, Adv. for ;K. Jagannathan

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment in S.C. No. 129 of 1986 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Madurai convicting the appellants for the offences under Sections 459, 302 read with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 2012

A.Prakash. Vs. the Commissioner and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.J.Rajakalifulla, Adv.

Prayer:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Respondent dated 14.10.2010 and made in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2013

1.Murugan Vs. the State,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2013

Subject : Criminal

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD) No.259 of 2005 ..... 1.Murugan 2.Udayakumar 3.Sundar ... Appellants -versus- The State, Rep. By...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial