Advanced Search Results

Kalasa Tea Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. Cct

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]135TAXMAN105(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Sarangan and S. Parthasarathi for the Assessee B. Anand for the Revenue.

ORDERP. Vishwanath Shetty, J.In these petitions filed under section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act), the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') has called in question...

B.L. Srinivasa Gowda (Huf) and anr. Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Agri ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 18(3-A)

Reported in : ILR2004KAR2608; [2004]270ITR332(KAR); [2004]270ITR332(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathi, Adv.

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP appearing for the respondents.2. Statement of objections has also been filed on behalf of the respondents.3. In these petitions...

Al. Ramanathan Amutha and Co. Vs. the Government of India Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3(A)(1), 3C, 3I, 16 and 17; National Highways Authorities Rules, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 17, 19(1), 136, 227 and 300A

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ888

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel for ;T. Sekar, Adv.

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. This petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.C1/61031/2003 dated 29.04.2005 and to consequentially direct the respondents to exclude the lands comprised in T.S. Nos. 249/1-A, 249/1-B, 253/2-A...

M. Rani Munirathinam Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 23A, 40A, 40A(2), 40A(3), 40A(4)(5), 40A(5), 40B, 40A(12), 40A(13) and 40A(14); Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Amendment) Act; Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Ordinance; Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1964; Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994; Bihar Land Reforms Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3, Rule 5 - Order 22, Rule 10

Reported in : (2008)1MLJ532

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathy, Sr. Counsel for R. Bharathkumar, Adv.

ORDERP. Jyothimani, J.1. The writ petition challenges the G.O.(D) No. 426, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (TP2) Department, dated 12.9.2007 passed by the first respondent. By the said impugned Order, the Government by exercise of its...

A. Viswanathan Vs. G. Lakshmi @ Seetha

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13, 13(1), 23 and 23(1); Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976; Special Marriage Act - Sections 27 and 28; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : (2007)1MLJ698

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathy, Sr. Counsel for ;V. Shankar, Adv.

V. Dhanapalan, J.1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the decree and judgment dated 23.04.1997 passed by the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Madras in FCOP No. 215 of 1997.2. The appellant and the...

Varuni Biomass Energy Products Private Ltd. Represented by Its Directo ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 19A, 19B and 24(3); Central Sales Act, 1956; Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act - Sections 22, 36, 37A, 38, 38(1), 38(3) and 59; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, and Rules 89 to 92

Reported in : (2009)19VST484(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathy, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Govindarajan, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 3847 and 4378 of 2008 and ;AR.L. Sundaresan, Sr. Counsel in WP. No. 5324/08

ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Heard both sides and perused the records.2. The petitioner in W.P. Nos. 3847 and 4378 of 2008 is M/s. Varuni Biomass Energy Products Private Ltd. The petitioner in W.P.5324 of 2008 is the...

Archana Bansal Vs. Nepc India Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(4); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 192A(2)

Reported in : [2008]88SCL97(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Parthasarathy and ;P. Srinivas, Advs.

R. Banumathi, J.1. The suit and applications have been filed at the instance of a shareholder of the first defendant challenging the transfer of Wind Energy Division from the first defendant to the second defendant.2. The...

D. Srinivasan Vs. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Its Secretary, Highways De ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: S. Parthasarathy, Senior Counsel M/s. M.N. Sumathy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. V.M. Velumani, Special Government Pleader.

(Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents, their agents, subordinates and men from evicting the petitioner from peaceful possession of his...

Madras Security Printers Rep. by Its Partner, P. Sam Prasad and Roseme ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 - Sections 8 and 18(2); Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000 - Rules 17, 18 and 18(5)

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC24; (2008)220CTR(Mad)350; (2008)4MLJ601

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishanmurthy, Sr. Counsel for ;Sathish Parasaran, Adv. in W.P. No. 2774/2008 and ;S. Parthasarathy, Sr. Counsel for ;V.C. Janardhanan, Adv. in W.P. No. 3508/2008

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. These two Writ Petitions have been filed, one by M/s. Madras Security Printers and the other by M/s. Rosemerta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., praying for a mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the petitioners'...

Kalia Pillai (Died) and ors. Vs. Kathayee Ammal Dharmam (Charities) Re ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 - Sections 3(3), 6(13), 6(16), 6(17), 10 and 109

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ122

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rajagopalan, Adv. for ;S. Chandrasekaran and P. Rose Kamalam in L.P.A. Nos. 107 and 108 of 1999 and ;S. Parthasarathy, Adv. for Sarvabhauman Associates in L.P.A. No. 34/2000

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.1. These three appeals are the typical examples of the case as to how the properties endowed for charities by charitably inclined persons are misused and resisted by suitors raising indefensible pleas when suit...