Advanced Search Results

K. Gandhi Vs. Union of India Rep by the Principal Chief Postmaster Gen ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: R. Malaichamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: S. Panneerselvam, Advocate.

1. This is an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The applicant Shri Gandhi has filed this OA seeking the following relief: “1) To direct the respondents to pay duty pay to...

The Deputy Director, Narcotics Control Bureau, South Zone, Madras Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 23, 29, 35 and 67; Customs Act - Sections 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002(2)ALT(Cri)36; 2003(159)ELT62(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Prakash, Spl. P.P.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The accused 1 and 2, the respondents herein were tried for the offences punishable under Sections 20 and 23 read with 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act alleging that they...

Moosa Vs The Correspondent

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1.Moosa 2.Amennabee 3.Apsar 4.Akthar 5.Afsana ..Appellants Vs. 1.The Correspondent, Vignesh International School, Melputhiyandal Village. 2.The Divisional Manager, The United India Insurance Company Ltd.,...

Mohamed Haneefa Vs. T.S. Arulanandam

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamilnadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 10(3), 10(3A), 10(5), 25, 33 and 33(1A)

Reported in : (2004)2MLJ616

Advocate for Appellant : M.M.Md. Sadakathulla, Adv.

ORDERM. Thanikachalam, J.1. The tenant, who was successful in resisting the eviction petition, before the Rent Controller, unable to sustain the same, when it is impugned in the appeal and its result is the revision.2. The...

K.Ethiraj Vs State of Tamilnadu rep by

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR K.Ethiraj Petitioner(s) Vs State of Tamilnadu rep by The Inspector of Police, Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section...

C. Alagu and Another Union of India Rep. by the Senior Superintendent ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: M/s. P. Rajendran, Advocate. For the Respondent : S. Panneerselvam, M. Venkateswararan, Advocates.

Hon'ble Mr. R. Satapathy, Administrative Member Since the issue involved in both these applications is similar and the relief sought for is also identical, these applications were heard together and are being disposed of by this...

Kaliyaperumal Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3387

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanammamalai, ;Sr. Counsel for M/s K.N. Basha and ;S. Panneerselvam, Adv.

ORDERJanarthanam, J.1. The appellant was the accused in S.C. No. 149 of 1985 on the file of the Court of Session West Thanjavur Division at Thanjavur. He was found guilty for an offence under section 302...

In Re: Chandrahasan, Prisoner (Accused No. 2)

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 149, 161, 302, 307, 341 and 418; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1996CriLJ4308

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv. for ;M/s. K.S. Rajagopalan and ;S. Panneerselvam, Adv.

Rengasami, J.1. The reference R.T. No. 1/96 and C.A. 128/96 arise from the conviction and sentences imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari at Nagercoil in S.C. No. 89/91 for the offences under Sections 418, 302,...

Babu and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 147, 148, 149 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1999CriLJ4906

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Panneerselvam and ;M. Rajasekharan, Advs.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. In S.C.No. 71 of 1988 on the file of the Court of Sessions Judge, North Arcot at Vellore, the appellants 1 to 3 were convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. and the appellants 4...

Chemical Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3, 6 and 9(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 174 and 174A

Reported in : 1999(107)ELT583(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Krishnan, Sr. Counsel for ;S. Panneerselvam and ;G. Mohanakrishnan, Advs.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. M/s. Chemical Construction Company (P) Limited and O.V. Nambiar, its Managing Director were convicted for the offence under Section 9(1)(i) of the Central Excise and Salt Act and sentenced to pay a fine...